Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer |
| Authors: |
Hui Sun, Huishan Wang, Yan Wei, Haiyin Wang, Chunlin Jin, Yingyao Chen |
| Source: |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2023) |
| Publisher Information: |
BMC, 2023. |
| Publication Year: |
2023 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Medicine (General) |
| Subject Terms: |
Non-small cell lung cancer, Cost-effectiveness analysis, Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy, Conventional fractionated radiotherapy, Medicine (General), R5-920 |
| More Details: |
Abstract Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel radio-therapeutic technique that has recently emerged as standard-of-care treatment for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we compared the cost-effectiveness of SBRT with that of conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in patients with medically inoperable, early-stage NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese health system. Methods A Markov model was developed to describe health states of patients after treatment with SBRT and CFRT. The recurrence risks, treatment toxicities, and utilities inputs were obtained from the literature. The costs were based on listed prices and real-world evidence. A simulation was conducted to determine the post-treatment lifetime years. For each treatment, the total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per QALY were calculated. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the model parameters. Results In the base case analysis, SBRT was associated with a mean cost of USD16,933 and 2.05 QALYs, whereas CFRT was associated with a mean cost of USD17,726 and 1.61 QALYs. SBRT is a more cost-effective strategy compared with CFRT for medically inoperable, early-stage NSCLC, with USD 1802 is saved for every incremental QALY. This result was validated by DSA and PSA, in which SBRT remained the most cost-effective option. Conclusions The findings suggested that, compared to CFRT, SBRT may be considered a more cost-effective strategy for medically inoperable, early-stage NSCLC. |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
1478-7547 |
| Relation: |
https://doaj.org/toc/1478-7547 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s12962-023-00452-w |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/e2f707e095284536bce857e525411146 |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.2f707e095284536bce857e525411146 |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
