Is urethral stricture only a circumferential disease? Reason for change in the plan of urethroplasty for bulbous urethral strictures shorter than 2 cm

Bibliographic Details
Title: Is urethral stricture only a circumferential disease? Reason for change in the plan of urethroplasty for bulbous urethral strictures shorter than 2 cm
Authors: Apul Goel, Anuj Goel, Satya Narain Sankhwar
Source: Indian Journal of Urology, Vol 29, Iss 1, Pp 27-30 (2013)
Publisher Information: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2013.
Publication Year: 2013
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
Subject Terms: Reconstruction, urethra, urethral stricture, urethroplasty, Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology, RC870-923
More Details: Objective: To understand the reasons for choosing the type of urethroplasty for bulbous strictures shorter than 2 cm in length that were ideally suited for anastomotic urethroplasty (AU). Materials and Methods: Data of adult men, who underwent urethroplasty between November 2002 and September 2011 for isolated bulbous strictures less than 2 cm in length, as measured intra-operatively, were reviewed. Patients who had undergone urethroplasty before were excluded. Data recorded were details of previous interventions, the etiology of the stricture and the type of urethroplasty performed. Results: Out of 277 men who underwent urethroplasty for bulbous stricture, 65 men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The etiologies were trauma in 24, post catheterization in 16, and idiopathic in 25. The mean stricture length was 1.60 cm (range 0.8 to 1.9). Anastomotic urethroplasty was performed in 41 men (Group 1). In the remaining 24 men, buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty was performed in 20 and augmented AU in 4 (Group 2). Comparing the two groups we found that Group 2 patients had undergone more internal urethrotomies (mean 2.45±0.88 vs. 1.58±0.63; P=0.005) and had longer stricture length as compared to men in Group 1 (mean 1.8±0.83 vs. 1.48±0.23 cm; P=0.005). The reason why AU could not be performed (Group 2) was shortening of the length of the urethra, making mobilization difficult. Conclusions: Even short strictures are associated with urethral shortening as the fibrosis is not only circumferential but also longitudinal. The surgeon should be prepared for an alternate plan even for bulbous urethral strictures shorter than 2 cm.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 0970-1591
1998-3824
Relation: http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2013;volume=29;issue=1;spage=27;epage=30;aulast=Goel; https://doaj.org/toc/0970-1591; https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3824
DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.109980
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/d28964c069be4cf192e83de595e79c85
Accession Number: edsdoj.28964c069be4cf192e83de595e79c85
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:09701591
19983824
DOI:10.4103/0970-1591.109980
Published in:Indian Journal of Urology
Language:English