A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate 20/800 mg in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Bibliographic Details
Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate 20/800 mg in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Authors: Su Hyun Park, Kang Nyeong Lee, Oh Young Lee, Myung Gyu Choi, Jie-Hyun Kim, In-Kyung Sung, Jae Young Jang, Kyung Sik Park, Hoon Jai Chun, Eun Young Kim, Jun Kyu Lee, Jin Seok Jang, Gwang Ha Kim, Su Jin Hong, Yong Chan Lee, Suck-Chei Choi, Hyun Soo Kim, Tae Oh Kim, Gwang Ho Baik, Yong Cheol Jeon
Source: Gut and Liver, Vol 17, Iss 2, Pp 226-233 (2023)
Publisher Information: Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology
Subject Terms: gastroesophageal reflux, phase iv clinical trial, esomeprazole, sodium bicarbonate, Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology, RC799-869
More Details: Background/Aims: Efficacy of proton pump inhibitors is limited in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole with sodium bicarbonate and esomeprazole alone. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority comparative study. A total of 379 patients with NERD were randomly allocated to receive either EsoduoⓇ (esomeprazole 20 mg with sodium bicarbonate 800 mg) or NexiumⓇ (esomeprazole 20 mg) once daily for 4 weeks from January 2019 to December 2019. The patients had a history of heartburn for at least 2 days in the week before randomization as well as in the last 3 months and no esophageal mucosal breaks on endoscopy. The primary endpoint was a complete cure of heartburn at week 4. The secondary and exploratory endpoints as well as the safety profiles were compared in the groups at weeks 2 and 4. Results: A total of 355 patients completed the study (180 in the EsoduoⓇ group and 175 in the NexiumⓇ group). The proportions of patients without heartburn in the entire 4th week of treatment were not different between the two groups (33.33% in the EsoduoⓇ group and 35% in the NexiumⓇ group, p=0.737). There were no significant differences in most of the secondary and exploratory endpoints as well as the safety profiles. Conclusions: EsoduoⓇ is as effective and safe as NexiumⓇ for managing typical symptoms in patients with NERD (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT03928470).
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1976-2283
Relation: http://gutnliver.org/journal/view.html?doi=10.5009/gnl220023; https://doaj.org/toc/1976-2283
DOI: 10.5009/gnl220023
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/26eeeee9c45a4e3089e410f274de1064
Accession Number: edsdoj.26eeeee9c45a4e3089e410f274de1064
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:19762283
DOI:10.5009/gnl220023
Published in:Gut and Liver
Language:English