Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Integrated Measure of PRogram Element SuStainability in Childcare Settings (IMPRESS-C): development and psychometric evaluation of a measure of sustainability determinants in the early childhood education and care setting |
| Authors: |
Adam Shoesmith, Nicole Nathan, Melanie Lum, Serene Yoong, Erin Nolan, Luke Wolfenden, Rachel C. Shelton, Brittany Cooper, Cassandra Lane, Alice Grady, Noor Imad, Edward Riley-Gibson, Nicole McCarthy, Nicole Pearson, Alix Hall |
| Source: |
Implementation Science, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2024) |
| Publisher Information: |
BMC, 2024. |
| Publication Year: |
2024 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Medicine (General) |
| Subject Terms: |
Sustainability, Sustainment, Measurement, Development, Reliability, Validity, Medicine (General), R5-920 |
| More Details: |
Abstract Background There is a need for valid and reliable measures of determinants of sustainability of public health interventions in early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric and pragmatic properties of such a measure – the Integrated Measure of PRogram Element SuStainability in Childcare Settings (IMPRESS-C). Methods We undertook a two-phase process guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist (COSMIN) and Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale (PAPERS). Phase 1 involved measure development; i.e., determining items and scales through an iterative process and assessment of face and content validity. Phase 2 involved the evaluation of psychometric and pragmatic properties. The 29-item measure completed by service executives (directors and nominated supervisors) was embedded in a larger survey from a national sample of Australian ECEC services assessing their implementation of nutrition and physical activity programs. Structural validity, concurrent validity, known groups validity, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, norms, and pragmatic qualities of the measure were assessed according to the PAPERS criteria. Results The final measure contained 26 items, with respondents reporting how strongly they agreed or disagreed on a five-point Likert scale. Phase 1 assessments confirmed the relevance, and face and content validity of the scale. In Phase 2, we obtained 482 completed surveys, of which 84% (n = 405) completed the entire measure across 405 ECEC settings (one executive per service). Three of the four fit indices for the confirmatory factor analysis met the pre-specified criteria (SRMR = 0.056, CFI = 0.993, RMSEA = 0.067) indicating ‘good’ structural validity. The IMPRESS-C illustrated: ‘good’ internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values from 0.53 to 0.92; ‘emerging’ concurrent validity; ‘poor’ known groups validity; ‘good’ norms; and ‘good’ overall pragmatic qualities (cost, readability, length, and assessor burden). Conclusions The IMPRESS-C possesses strong psychometric and pragmatic qualities for assessing service executive-level perceptions of determinants influencing sustainment of public health interventions within ECEC settings. To achieve a full range of perspectives in this setting, future work should be directed to also develop and test measures of sustainability determinants at the implementer level (e.g., among individual educators and staff). |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
1748-5908 |
| Relation: |
https://doaj.org/toc/1748-5908 |
| DOI: |
10.1186/s13012-024-01372-w |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/2431e22f1bc54199b76be091e836b94d |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.2431e22f1bc54199b76be091e836b94d |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
