Central line replacement following infection does not improve reinfection rates in pediatric pulmonary hypertension patients receiving intravenous prostanoid therapy

Bibliographic Details
Title: Central line replacement following infection does not improve reinfection rates in pediatric pulmonary hypertension patients receiving intravenous prostanoid therapy
Authors: Elisa K. McCarthy, Michelle T. Ogawa, Rachel K. Hopper, Jeffrey A. Feinstein, Hayley A. Gans
Source: Pulmonary Circulation, Vol 8 (2018)
Publisher Information: Wiley, 2018.
Publication Year: 2018
Collection: LCC:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
LCC:Diseases of the respiratory system
Subject Terms: Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system, RC666-701, Diseases of the respiratory system, RC705-779
More Details: Treatment of pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH) with IV prostanoids has greatly improved outcomes but requires a central line, posing inherent infection risk. This study examines the types of infections, infection rates, and importantly the effect of line management strategies on reinfection in children receiving IV prostanoids for PH. This study is a retrospective review of all pediatric PH patients receiving intravenous epoprostenol (EPO) or treprostinil (TRE) at one academic tertiary care center between 2000 and 2014. No patients declined participation in the study or were otherwise excluded. Infectious complications were characterized by organism(s), infection rates, time to next infection, and line management decisions (salvage vs. replace). Of the 40 patients followed, 13 sustained 38 infections involving 49 pathogens, with a predominance of gram-positive (GP) organisms (n = 35). The pooled infection rate was 1.06 per 1000 prostanoid days with no difference between EPO and TRE. No significant difference in reinfection rate was observed when comparing line salvage to replacement, regardless of organism type. Both overall and organism-type comparisons suggest longer time between line infections following line salvage compared with line replacement (732 vs. 410 days overall; 793 vs. 363 days for GP; 611 vs. 581 days for gram-negative [GN]; P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Central line replacement following blood stream infections in pediatric PH patients does not improve subsequent infection rates or time to next infection, and may lead to unnecessary risks associated with line replacement, including potential loss of vascular access. A revised approach to central line infections in pediatric PH is proposed.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2045-8940
20458932
Relation: https://doaj.org/toc/2045-8940
DOI: 10.1177/2045893218754886
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/2307a3438a7b4c7e9a64f1dc0cfd6cb5
Accession Number: edsdoj.2307a3438a7b4c7e9a64f1dc0cfd6cb5
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:20458940
20458932
DOI:10.1177/2045893218754886
Published in:Pulmonary Circulation
Language:English