The Impact of Seropositivity on Systemic Bone Loss in Rheumatoid Arthritis—A 3-Year Interim Analysis of a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study

Bibliographic Details
Title: The Impact of Seropositivity on Systemic Bone Loss in Rheumatoid Arthritis—A 3-Year Interim Analysis of a Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study
Authors: Shan-Fu Yu, Jia-Feng Chen, Ying-Chou Chen, Yu-Wei Wang, Chung-Yuan Hsu, Han-Ming Lai, Hsiao-Ru He, Chi-Hua Ko, Wen-Chan Chiu, Tien-Tsai Cheng
Source: Frontiers in Medicine, Vol 9 (2022)
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022.
Publication Year: 2022
Collection: LCC:Medicine (General)
Subject Terms: rheumatoid arthritis, bone mineral density, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, rheumatoid factor, fracture, Medicine (General), R5-920
More Details: ObjectiveTo explore the impact of seropositivity on systemic bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsWe conducted an interim analysis of the RA registry. Patients were examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and again 3 years later. Participants were grouped into seropositive (SPRA) and seronegative (SNRA) based on the presence or absence of rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA). After matching (1:2) for age and sex, SNRA and SPRA patients were divided into groups A and B. Each matched group (A or B) was further subdivided according to the number of antibodies present (0, group I; 1, group II; 2, group III). Multiple ordinary least squares regression was used with the dependent variables to develop a model to predict bone mineral density (BMD) change.ResultsA total of 477 participants who completed a 3-year observation period were included. After matching, 312 participants were enrolled (group A, 104; group B, 208). Three years later, group B had significant BMD reduction in the femoral neck (FN) (p < 0.001), total hip (TH) (p = 0.001), and first through fourth lumbar vertebrae (L1–4) (p = 0.006), while group A had bone loss only at FN (p = 0.002). Groups I, II, and III included 104, 52, and 156 participants, respectively. Compared to baseline, BMD decreased significantly at FN (p = 0.002) in group I, FN (p < 0.001) in group II, and FN (p < 0.001), TH (p = 0.002), and L1–4 (p = 0.016) in group III. In terms of regression-adjusted percent change in BMD, more significantly negative changes were found at all measured sites in group B (p < 0.001, all) and at TH and L1–4 within groups I-III (p for trend < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Regardless of antibodies, anti-osteoporotic therapy can preserve bone density in RA patients.ConclusionAfter 3 years, SPRA patients lost more bone density than SNRA patients. More attention should be paid to SPRA patients, especially those with double-positive antibodies, including a vigorous evaluation of BMD and fracture risk. Anti-osteoporotic therapy can prevent BMD loss irrespective of autoantibodies.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2296-858X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.885801/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2296-858X
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.885801
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/221ba5402df742f6b3efad83cec2cdcf
Accession Number: edsdoj.221ba5402df742f6b3efad83cec2cdcf
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:2296858X
DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.885801
Published in:Frontiers in Medicine
Language:English