Comparative analysis of fluoroscopic-guided and ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection in patient with clinical sacroiliitis

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparative analysis of fluoroscopic-guided and ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint injection in patient with clinical sacroiliitis
Authors: Chetna Shamshery, Vijayakumar Vissnu Kumar, Anil Agarwal, Rajashree Madubashi, Aakanksha Aggarwal
Source: Indian Journal of Pain, Vol 34, Iss 2, Pp 94-100 (2020)
Publisher Information: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2020.
Publication Year: 2020
Collection: LCC:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
Subject Terms: fluoroscopy, low back pain, sacroiliac joint, sacroiliitis, ultrasonography, Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system, RC346-429
More Details: Background: The complex anatomy of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) mandates an imaging modality to perform the diagnostic or therapeutic joint injection. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with sacroiliitis were randomly allocated into two groups, and were given SIJ injection using either fluroscopy (FL) or ultrasound (USG) as a guide to intervene. The assessment of pain by numerical rating scale (NRS), psychological and quality of life assessment by Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively, learning curve evaluation by the number of attempts, time taken and subjective ease of performing the procedure were evaluated. Results: Decreased numerical rating score (NRS) of pain from preprocedure mean value of 7.39 ± 0.20–0.94 ± 0.15 in the FL grp and 7.22 ± 0.21 to 2.78 ± 0.32 in the USG group at 4 weeks was significant and comparable (P < 0.001). The improvement in DASS from 40.78 ± 1.96–22.78 ± 0.49 (P < 0.001) in FL grp and 41.33 ± 1.62–25.22 ± 0.73 (P < 0.001) in USG group were significant and comparable after 12 weeks' follow-up. ODI decreased from 45.44 ± 0.99–20.78 ± 0.84 (P < 0.001) and 46.33 ± 0.98–24.11 ± 0.95 (P < 0.001) in FL and USG grp after 12 weeks. Fluoroscopic procedure took 1–3 attempts compared to 2–4 for USG. The average time taken to perform fluoroscopic intervention was 6.89 ± 0.23 min as compared to 9.32 ± 0.87 min by USG. Conclusion: USG and FL both are effective tools to intervene the SIJ but USG requires greater skill.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 0970-5333
Relation: http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2020;volume=34;issue=2;spage=94;epage=100;aulast=Shamshery; https://doaj.org/toc/0970-5333
DOI: 10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_27_20
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/16c72c017169441cb878094767117495
Accession Number: edsdoj.16c72c017169441cb878094767117495
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:09705333
DOI:10.4103/ijpn.ijpn_27_20
Published in:Indian Journal of Pain
Language:English