Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
ENHANCE: a comparative prospective longitudinal study of cognitive outcomes after 3 years of hearing aid use in older adults |
| Authors: |
Julia Z. Sarant, Peter A. Busby, Adrian J. Schembri, Christopher Fowler, David C. Harris |
| Source: |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, Vol 15 (2024) |
| Publisher Information: |
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024. |
| Publication Year: |
2024 |
| Collection: |
LCC:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
| Subject Terms: |
hearing loss, dementia, hearing aids, cognitive performance, risk factor, delay, Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, RC321-571 |
| More Details: |
BackgroundWith an aging population, the prevalence of hearing loss and dementia are increasing rapidly. Hearing loss is currently considered the largest potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia. The effect of hearing interventions on cognitive function should therefore be investigated, as if effective, these may be successfully implemented to modify cognitive outcomes for older adults with hearing loss.MethodsThis prospective longitudinal observational cohort study compared outcomes of a convenience sample of prospectively recruited first-time hearing aid users without dementia from an audiology center with those of community-living older adults participating in a large prospective longitudinal cohort study with/without hearing loss and/or hearing aids. All participants were assessed at baseline, 18 months, and 36 months using the same measures.ResultsParticipants were 160 audiology clinic patients (48.8% female patient; mean age 73.5 years) with mild–severe hearing loss, fitted with hearing aids at baseline, and 102 participants of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Aging (AIBL) (55.9% female patient; mean age 74.5 years). 18- and 36-month outcomes of subsets of the first participants to reach these points and complete the cognition assessment to date are compared. Primary comparative analysis showed cognitive stability for the hearing aid group while the AIBL group declined on working memory, visual attention, and psychomotor function. There was a non-significant trend for decline in visual learning for the AIBL group versus no decline for the hearing aid group. The hearing aid group showed significant decline on only 1 subtest and at a significantly slower rate than for the AIBL participants (p |
| Document Type: |
article |
| File Description: |
electronic resource |
| Language: |
English |
| ISSN: |
1663-4365 |
| Relation: |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1302185/full; https://doaj.org/toc/1663-4365 |
| DOI: |
10.3389/fnagi.2023.1302185 |
| Access URL: |
https://doaj.org/article/1128ab05bd2b4b0fbf52fc97c76a865a |
| Accession Number: |
edsdoj.1128ab05bd2b4b0fbf52fc97c76a865a |
| Database: |
Directory of Open Access Journals |
