Combined use of respiratory multiplex PCR and procalcitonin to reduce antibiotic exposure in sickle-cell adult patients with acute chest syndrome (The ANTIBIO-STA study): a randomised, controlled, open-label trialResearch in context

Bibliographic Details
Title: Combined use of respiratory multiplex PCR and procalcitonin to reduce antibiotic exposure in sickle-cell adult patients with acute chest syndrome (The ANTIBIO-STA study): a randomised, controlled, open-label trialResearch in context
Authors: Alexandre Sabaté-Elabbadi, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, François Lionnet, Aline Santin, Charlotte Verdet, Paul-Louis Woerther, Julien Lopinto, Matthieu Turpin, Alexandra Rousseau, Romane Lacoste-Badie, Keyvan Razazi, Guillaume Voiriot, Muriel Fartoukh
Source: The Lancet Regional Health. Europe, Vol 51, Iss , Pp 101234- (2025)
Publisher Information: Elsevier, 2025.
Publication Year: 2025
Collection: LCC:Public aspects of medicine
Subject Terms: Acute chest syndrome, Sickle cell anemia, Multiplex polymerase chain reaction, Procalcitonin, Anti-bacterial agents, Public aspects of medicine, RA1-1270
More Details: Summary: Background: Respiratory infection may account for 30% of acute chest syndrome (ACS) aetiologies. However, antimicrobials are routinely prescribed, and de-escalation and/or discontinuation are challenging. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) with an enlarged respiratory panel might support antimicrobial stewardship, and procalcitonin (PCT) measurements help reduce duration of antibiotic therapy. We hypothesized that a strategy combining the use of mPCR with repeated PCT measurements would reduce antibiotic exposure during ACS. Methods: We conducted a randomised, controlled, parallel group, open-label study in two French hospitals. Consecutive adult patients with ACS were randomly assigned to the conventional or interventional strategy, where antibiotic therapy was targeted on the results of mPCR performed on lower respiratory tract secretions (LRTS) samples, and antibiotic discontinuation based on PCT values and kinetics at Day 1 (D1), D3 and D7. The primary outcome was the number of days of antibiotic exposure at D28 after randomisation. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03919266) and is closed to recruitment. Findings: From June 2020 to September 2022, 72 patients were assigned to the interventional (n = 37) or conventional strategy (n = 35). Despite a higher rate of microbiological documentation with the intervention (n = 25; 67.6% versus n = 13; 37.1%; difference, 30.4%; 95% CI 6.7%–51.5%), antibiotic exposure at D28 was similar between the two strategies (6 days [4.0–8.0] versus 6 days [5.0–9.0], respectively; difference, 0.0 day; 95% CI, −2.1 to 2.1). The time to clinical stability, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay did not differ. Interpretation: As compared with conventional tests, an enlarged respiratory panel mPCR combined with a PCT-guided algorithm did not reduce antibiotic exposure at D28 in adults with ACS. Funding: Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, AP-HP (CRC180159). A financial support for the multiplex PCR kits used in this study was partially provided by bioMérieux.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2666-7762
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776225000262; https://doaj.org/toc/2666-7762
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101234
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/099846437309441799bf03334ec09798
Accession Number: edsdoj.099846437309441799bf03334ec09798
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:26667762
DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101234
Published in:The Lancet Regional Health. Europe
Language:English