Academic Journal
Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria
| Title: | Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Carlo Alviggi, Peter Humaidan, Robert Fischer, Alessandro Conforti, Michael H. Dahan, Antonio La Marca, Raoul Orvieto, Nikolaos P. Polyzos, Matheus Roque, Sesh K. Sunkara, Filippo Maria Ubaldi, Lan Vuong, Hakan Yarali, Thomas D’Hooghe, Salvatore Longobardi, Sandro C. Esteves |
| Source: | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-22 (2024) |
| Publisher Information: | BMC, 2024. |
| Publication Year: | 2024 |
| Collection: | LCC:Gynecology and obstetrics LCC:Reproduction |
| Subject Terms: | Assisted reproductive technology (ART), Delphi consensus, Ovarian stimulation, POSEIDON Criteria, Low prognosis, Cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), Gynecology and obstetrics, RG1-991, Reproduction, QH471-489 |
| More Details: | Abstract Background Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal management of women with low prognosis in ART. In this Delphi consensus, a panel of international experts provided real-world clinical perspectives on a series of literature-supported consensus statements regarding the overall relevance of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis in ART. Methods Using a Delphi-consensus framework, twelve experts plus two Scientific Coordinators discussed and amended statements and supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinators (Round 1). Statements were distributed via an online survey to an extended panel of 53 experts, of whom 36 who voted anonymously on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement using a six-point Likert-type scale (1 = Absolutely agree; 2 = More than agree; 3 = Agree; 4 = Disagree; 5 = More than disagree; 6 = Absolutely disagree) (Round 2). Consensus was reached if > 66% of participants agreed or disagreed. Results The extended panel voted on seventeen statements and subcategorized them according to relevance. All but one statement reached consensus during the first round; the remaining statement reached consensus after rewording. Statements were categorized according to impact, low-prognosis validation, outcomes and patient management. The POSEIDON criteria are timely and clinically sound. The preferred success measure is cumulative live birth and key management strategies include the use of recombinant FSH preparations, supplementation with r-hLH, dose increases and oocyte/embryo accumulation through vitrification. Tools such as the ART Calculator and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index may be considered. Validation data from large, prospective studies in each POSEIDON group are now needed to corroborate existing retrospective data. Conclusions This Delphi consensus provides an overview of expert opinion on the clinical implications of the POSEIDON criteria for women with low prognosis to ovarian stimulation. |
| Document Type: | article |
| File Description: | electronic resource |
| Language: | English |
| ISSN: | 1477-7827 |
| Relation: | https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7827 |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12958-024-01291-x |
| Access URL: | https://doaj.org/article/d081a634714f4da089db1217268096aa |
| Accession Number: | edsdoj.081a634714f4da089db1217268096aa |
| Database: | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Full text is not displayed to guests. | Login for full access. |
| ISSN: | 14777827 |
|---|---|
| DOI: | 10.1186/s12958-024-01291-x |
| Published in: | Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology |
| Language: | English |