BRCA1-methylated triple negative breast cancers previously exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy form RAD51 foci and respond poorly to olaparib

Bibliographic Details
Title: BRCA1-methylated triple negative breast cancers previously exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy form RAD51 foci and respond poorly to olaparib
Authors: Carolina Velazquez, Esin Orhan, Imene Tabet, Lise Fenou, Béatrice Orsetti, José Adélaïde, Arnaud Guille, Simon Thézénas, Evelyne Crapez, Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo, Max Chaffanet, Daniel Birnbaum, Claude Sardet, William Jacot, Charles Theillet
Source: Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 13 (2023)
Publisher Information: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
Subject Terms: TNBC, BRCA1 methylation, RAD51, nuclear foci, HRD (homologous recombination deficiency), Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
More Details: BackgroundAbout 15% of Triple-Negative-Breast-Cancer (TNBC) present silencing of the BRCA1 promoter methylation and are assumed to be Homologous Recombination Deficient (HRD). BRCA1-methylated (BRCA1-Me) TNBC could, thus, be eligible to treatment based on PARP-inhibitors or Platinum salts. However, their actual HRD status is discussed, as these tumors are suspected to develop resistance after chemotherapy exposure.MethodsWe interrogated the sensitivity to olaparib vs. carboplatin of 8 TNBC Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX) models. Four PDX corresponded to BRCA1-Me, of which 3 were previously exposed to NeoAdjuvant-Chemotherapy (NACT). The remaining PDX models corresponded to two BRCA1-mutated (BRCA1-Mut) and two BRCA1-wild type PDX that were respectively included as positive and negative controls. The HRD status of our PDX models was assessed using both genomic signatures and the functional BRCA1 and RAD51 nuclear foci formation assay. To assess HR restoration associated with olaparib resistance, we studied pairs of BRCA1 deficient cell lines and their resistant subclones.ResultsThe 3 BRCA1-Me PDX that had been exposed to NACT responded poorly to olaparib, likewise BRCA1-WT PDX. Contrastingly, 3 treatment-naïve BRCA1-deficient PDX (1 BRCA1-Me and 2 BRCA1-mutated) responded to olaparib. Noticeably, the three olaparib-responsive PDX scored negative for BRCA1- and RAD51-foci, whereas all non-responsive PDX models, including the 3 NACT-exposed BRCA1-Me PDX, scored positive for RAD51-foci. This suggested HRD in olaparib responsive PDX, while non-responsive models were HR proficient. These results were consistent with observations in cell lines showing a significant increase of RAD51-foci in olaparib-resistant subclones compared with sensitive parental cells, suggesting HR restoration in these models.ConclusionOur results thus support the notion that the actual HRD status of BRCA1-Me TNBC, especially if previously exposed to chemotherapy, may be questioned and should be verified using the BRCA1- and RAD51-foci assay.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 2234-943X
Relation: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1125021/full; https://doaj.org/toc/2234-943X
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1125021
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/e04a4c983fe14d5c8fffd7f0ddb98082
Accession Number: edsdoj.04a4c983fe14d5c8fffd7f0ddb98082
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:2234943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1125021
Published in:Frontiers in Oncology
Language:English