Determining the screening frequency for sexually transmitted infections for people who use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bibliographic Details
Title: Determining the screening frequency for sexually transmitted infections for people who use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Cham-mill Kim, Victor Zhao, Maeve Brito De Mello, Rachel Baggaley, Cheryl C. Johnson, Erica Spielman, Christopher K. Fairley, Lei Zhang, Henry de Vries, Jeffrey Klausner, Rui Zhao, Jason J. Ong
Source: International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol 129, Iss , Pp 181-187 (2023)
Publisher Information: Elsevier, 2023.
Publication Year: 2023
Collection: LCC:Infectious and parasitic diseases
Subject Terms: HIV, PrEP, Pre-exposure prophylaxis, Sexually transmitted infections, Screening, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216
More Details: ABSTRACT: Objectives: Although the World Health Organization recommends ‘frequent’ screening of sexually transmitted infections (STI) for people who use pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV, there is no evidence for optimal frequency. Methods: We searched five databases and used random-effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates of STI test positivity. We narratively synthesized data on secondary outcomes, including adherence to recommended STI screening frequency and changes in STI epidemiology. Results: Of 7477 studies, we included 38 for the meta-analysis and 11 for secondary outcomes. With 2-3 monthly STI screening, the pooled positivity was 0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.25) for chlamydia, 0.17 (95% CI: 0.12-0.22) for gonorrhea, and 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.08) for syphilis. For chlamydia and gonorrhea, the positivity was approximately 50% and 75% lower, respectively, in studies that screened 4-6 monthly vs 2-3 monthly. There was no significant difference in the positivity for syphilis in studies that screened 4-6 monthly compared to 2-3 monthly. Adherence of clients to recommended screening frequency varied significantly (39-94%) depending on population and country. Modeling studies suggest more frequent STI screening could reduce incidence. Conclusion: Although more frequent STI screening could reduce delayed diagnoses and incidence, there remain significant knowledge gaps regarding the optimal STI screening frequency.
Document Type: article
File Description: electronic resource
Language: English
ISSN: 1201-9712
Relation: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971223000073; https://doaj.org/toc/1201-9712
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.01.007
Access URL: https://doaj.org/article/01511c11f6964e7283192953b42e448b
Accession Number: edsdoj.01511c11f6964e7283192953b42e448b
Database: Directory of Open Access Journals
More Details
ISSN:12019712
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2023.01.007
Published in:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Language:English