Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Xenogenous Bone Blocks: A Comparison Between the Flap and Tunneling Procedures.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Xenogenous Bone Blocks: A Comparison Between the Flap and Tunneling Procedures.
Authors: Feng Xuan, Chun-Ui Lee, Jeong-Seog Son, Yiqin Fang, Seung-Mi Jeong, Byung-Ho Choi
Source: Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391); Sep2014, Vol. 72 Issue 9, p1660-1670, 11p
Abstract: Purpose Previous studies have shown that the subperiosteal tunneling procedure in vertical ridge augmentation accelerates healing after grafting and prevents graft exposure, with minor postoperative complications. It is conceivable that new bone formation would be greater with the tunneling procedure than with the flap procedure, because the former is minimally invasive. This hypothesis was tested in this study by comparing new bone formation between the flap and tunneling procedures after vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone blocks in a canine mandible model. Materials and Methods Two Bio-Oss blocks were placed on the edentulous ridge in each side of the mandibles of 6 mongrel dogs. The blocks in each side were randomly assigned to grafting with a flap procedure (flap group) or grafting with a tunneling procedure (tunneling group). Results The mean percentage of newly formed bone within the block was 15.3 ± 6.6% in the flap group and 46.6 ± 23.4% in the tunneling group. Conclusion Based on data presented in this study, when a tunneling procedure is used to place xenogenous bone blocks for vertical ridge augmentation, bone formation in the graft sites is significantly greater than when a flap procedure is used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391) is the property of W B Saunders and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Supplemental Index
More Details
ISSN:02782391
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.003
Published in:Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (02782391)
Language:English