Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Extended Prone Position and 90-Day Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19. |
| Authors: |
Estrella-Alonso, Alfonso, Silva-Obregón, J. Alberto, Fernández-Tobar, Rodrigo, Marián-Crespo, Carlos, de Santaquiteria-Torres, Valentín Ruiz, Jiménez-Puente, Gema, Arroyo-Espliguero, Ramón, Viana-Llamas, María C., Ramírez-Cervantes, Karen Lizzette, Quintana-Díaz, Manuel |
| Source: |
Respiratory Care; Oct2024, Vol. 69 Issue 10, p1255-1265, 11p |
| Subject Terms: |
ADULT respiratory distress syndrome treatment, MORTALITY risk factors, RISK assessment, CONTINUING education units, PATIENTS, ADULT respiratory distress syndrome, EXTRACORPOREAL membrane oxygenation, T-test (Statistics), DATA analysis, LYING down position, FISHER exact test, RETROSPECTIVE studies, SEVERITY of illness index, CHI-squared test, QUANTITATIVE research, MANN Whitney U Test, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, LONGITUDINAL method, KAPLAN-Meier estimator, LOG-rank test, ARTIFICIAL respiration, STATISTICS, CONFIDENCE intervals, COMPARATIVE studies, DATA analysis software, SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC factors, COVID-19, MECHANICAL ventilators, PROPORTIONAL hazards models, SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics), NONPARAMETRIC statistics, COMORBIDITY |
| Abstract: |
BACKGROUND: Prone positioning (PP) has demonstrated its potential for improving outcomes in patients with ARDS who require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, the ability of prolonged proning to reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19 specifically, sessions lasting > 24 h remains uncertain. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 158 subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation due to moderate-to-severe ARDS. Seventy-six subjects were placed in standard PP and 82 in extended PP, defined as prone sessions lasting at least 32 h. Our primary aim was to evaluate the effect of EPP on 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 with acute severe respiratory failure. To ensure the reliability of our findings and to minimize bias, we applied 3 adjustment approaches: cardinality matching (CM), matching weighting (MW), and inverse probability of treatment weighting with stabilized and trimmed weights (SW). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the effects of EPP on 90-d mortality and sensitivity analysis by calculating E-values. RESULTS: The overall crude 90-d mortality rate was 31.7%. The unadjusted 90-d mortality rates were 19.5% in the EPP group and 44.7% in the SPP group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.19- 0.63], P < .001). After adjustment for confounding factors using CM, MW, and SW, baseline covariates were balanced between the 2 groups. Subjects in the EPP group exhibited lower 90-d mortality rates after adjustment using CM (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.23-0.79], P = .007), MW (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.21-0.95], P = .036), or SW (HR 0.29 [95% CI 0.15-0.56], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Extended PP was associated with improved 90-d survival in subjects with COVID-19 undergoing mechanical ventilation for severe ARDS. These findings suggest the potential benefit of EPP in the management of COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Further research and prospective studies are warranted to confirm and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of this association. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Respiratory Care is the property of American Association for Respiratory Care and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Supplemental Index |
