The effect of norepinephrine versus dopamine in renal transplant recipients on postoperative graft function.

Bibliographic Details
Title: The effect of norepinephrine versus dopamine in renal transplant recipients on postoperative graft function.
Authors: Elgharib, Asmaa Moatasem, Ibrahem, Nagwa M, Ibrahim, Abdelrady S, Ahmed, Ahmed Abdelkader, Soliman, Omar M
Source: Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia; Dec2024, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p112-118, 7p
Abstract: Background: Finding the ideal vasopressor for use during the crucial phase of graft anastomosis is still an ongoing search to improve graft function in recipients of renal transplants. This study aimed to compare the effect of norepinephrine versus dopamine on renal graft function and postoperative serum creatinine. Methods: A randomized single-blind clinical trial of 44 patients was divided into two equal groups. Group N: norepinephrine infusion was used at a starting dose of 0.05μg/kg/min with dose range: 0.05–0.15 μ/kg/min and group D; dopamine infusion was used at a starting dose of 5μg/kg/min with dose range: 5–15 μ/kg/min. Postoperative serum creatinine and renal doppler resistive index, were compared between the two groups. Results: There were significant differences within and between both groups over time regarding postoperative serum creatinine levels (group D, P-value < 0.001, group N, P-value < 0.001 and between both groups, P-value=0.013). Regarding the hemodynamics, after perfusion of the new renal graft, at 30 min the norepinephrine group had lower HR than dopamine group (P-value=0.031), at 20 and 30 min the norepinephrine group had higher CVP than dopamine group (P-value=0.015 and 0.022 respectively), at immediate time of perfusion (0 time) and 20 min post perfusion, the dopamine group had higher UOP than norepinephrine group (P-value=0.012 and 0.001 respectively), while there was no significant difference in the postoperative hemodynamic data. Conclusions: Norepinephrine and dopamine have comparable effects on graft function in the renal recipient patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Supplemental Index
More Details
ISSN:11101849
DOI:10.1080/11101849.2024.2315375
Published in:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Language:English