General practitioner practices in requesting laboratory tests for patients with gastroenteritis in the Netherlands, 2001-2002.

Bibliographic Details
Title: General practitioner practices in requesting laboratory tests for patients with gastroenteritis in the Netherlands, 2001-2002.
Authors: van den Brandhof, Winette E, Bartelds, Aad IM, Koopmans, Marion PG, van Duynhoven, Yvonne THP
Source: BMC Family Practice; 2006, Vol. 7, p56-8, 8p, 5 Charts, 1 Graph
Subject Terms: GASTROENTERITIS, GENERAL practitioners, PATIENTS, PATHOGENIC microorganisms, DIAGNOSIS
Geographic Terms: NETHERLANDS
Abstract: Background: The objective of this study was to estimate the (selective) proportion of patients consulting their GP for an episode of gastroenteritis for whom laboratory tests were requested. In addition adherence of GPs to the guidelines for diagnostic test regime was ascertained. Methods: Data were collected from a GP network in the Netherlands. Information was also collected on the reason for requesting the test, test specifications, and test results. Results: For 12% of the GP patients with gastroenteritis, a stool sample was requested and tested for enteric pathogens. In most patients, the duration, followed by severity of complaints or a visit to a specific, high-risk country were reported as reasons to request laboratory diagnostics. Tests were requested most often in summer months and in February. Campylobacter (requested for 87% of the tests), Salmonella (84%), Shigella (78%) and Yersinia (56%) were most frequently included in the stool tests. Campylobacter was detected most often in patients. Conclusion: Test requests did not always comply with existing knowledge of the etiology of gastroenteritis in GP patients and were not always consistent with the Dutch GP guidelines. Therefore, the data of this study can be used to develop educational approaches for GP's as well as for revision of the guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BMC Family Practice is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:14712296
DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-7-56
Published in:BMC Family Practice
Language:English