Oncoplastic breast reconstruction with single-port laparoscopically harvested omental flap: insights from a ten-year tertiary center experience.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Oncoplastic breast reconstruction with single-port laparoscopically harvested omental flap: insights from a ten-year tertiary center experience.
Authors: Yoon, K.-H., Ahn, S.-H., Shin, H.-C., Koh, H. W., Park, J. K.-H., Myung, Y., Jeong, J. H., Heo, C. Y., Kim, E.-K.
Source: Breast Cancer Research & Treatment; Apr2025, Vol. 210 Issue 2, p355-364, 10p
Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the 10-year functional and oncological outcomes of single-port laparoscopically harvested omental flap (SLOF) for immediate breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. The technical feasibility and oncologic safety of breast reconstruction using a laparoscopically harvested omental flap remain controversial. Methods: We examined 236 patients with breast cancer (including 2 patients with malignant phyllodes tumors) who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery followed by immediate SLOF reconstruction between February 2015 and March 2024 at our institution. Short- and long-term outcomes were assessed. Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using a three-panel assessment and the Seoul Breast Esthetic Scoring Tool and compared with those of a matched cohort of patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Results: The rate of clinically significant complications of Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or greater was 3.8% (9/236). Two patients with flap failure required flap removal and conversion to other reconstruction procedures. The cosmetic satisfaction rates were 82.5% and 76.4% in the SLOF and DIEP groups, respectively (P = 0.467). Over a median 59-month follow-up, the local, regional, and systemic recurrence rates were 3%, 2.1%, and 3%, respectively. All patients underwent annual screening for gastric cancer via esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and there were no cases of delayed flap removal due to gastrectomy. Conclusions: Oncoplastic breast reconstruction using SLOF is safe and feasible. The natural contour and texture of the reconstructed breast and the nearly invisible scar at the abdominal single-port incision provide excellent cosmetic outcomes that are superior to those of other reconstruction methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Breast Cancer Research & Treatment is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:01676806
DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07571-9
Published in:Breast Cancer Research & Treatment
Language:English