Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in heavily calcified aortic valve stenosis: a multicenter comparison.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in heavily calcified aortic valve stenosis: a multicenter comparison.
Authors: Saad, M., Seoudy, H., Bramlage, K., Bramlage, P., Voran, J. C., Puehler, T., Lutter, G., Allali, A., Landt, M., Frank, J., Bisht, O., Salem, M., Wienemann, H., Adam, M., Zeus, T., Veulemans, V., Bleiziffer, S., Rudolph, T. K., Frank, D.
Source: Clinical Research in Cardiology; Mar2025, Vol. 114 Issue 3, p405-415, 11p
Abstract: Background: Heavy calcifications in severe aortic stenosis (AS) pose a major challenge in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Only a few studies have addressed the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THV) in this subgroup of patients. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the outcomes of the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve Evolut valve frame and the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV in this challenging patient population. Materials and methods: This was a multicenter registry including a total of 1513 patients with heavily calcified AS undergoing TAVR. The primary endpoint was the incidence and degree of paravalvular leak (PVL) after TAVR. Secondary endpoints were post-implant hemodynamics as well as clinical endpoints according to the VARC-3 definitions. Results: The CoreValve Evolut R but not the Evolut PRO showed significantly higher rates of PVL compared to the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra (44.8% vs. 29.5% for mild PVL, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in ≥ moderate PVL between both groups (p = 0.399). The CoreValve Evolut R and Evolut PRO showed superior THV hemodynamics compared to the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra group. These findings were confirmed in a propensity score-matched analysis. There were no significant differences regarding short-term outcomes including permanent pacemaker implantation and all-cause mortality between the three groups. Conclusion: In patients with severely calcified AS, both CoreValve Evolut PRO and SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra THV showed lower rates of PVL than the CoreValve Evolut R. The self-expanding CoreValve platform had superior post-implant hemodynamics than the SAPIEN-3/3 Ultra system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical Research in Cardiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:18610684
DOI:10.1007/s00392-025-02611-w
Published in:Clinical Research in Cardiology
Language:English