| Title: |
Effectiveness of Synchronous Postdischarge Contacts on Health Care Use and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
| Authors: |
Boggan, Joel C., Sankineni, Spoorthi, Dennis, Paul A., Chen, Dazhe, Sledge, Tina Wong, Halpern, David, Rushton, Sharron, Williams, John W., Der, Tatyana, Tabriz, Amir Alishahi, Gordon, Adelaide M., Jacobs, Morgan, Boucher, Nathan A., Colandrea, Maria, Alexopoulos, Anastasia-Stefania, Roman Jones, Joanne, Leflore-Lloyd, Nina, Cantrell, Sarah, Goldstein, Karen M., Gierisch, Jennifer M. |
| Source: |
Annals of Internal Medicine; Feb2025, Vol. 178 Issue 2, p229-240, 13p |
| Subject Terms: |
MEDICAL care use, PATIENT satisfaction, PATIENT readmissions, CINAHL database, HOSPITAL utilization |
| Abstract: |
Postdischarge contacts (PDCs) after hospitalization are common, but their effectiveness in reducing acute care use after discharge is unclear. In this systematic review of 13 studies, most PDC interventions consisted of single telephone contacts and showed no differences in 30-day emergency department use or 30-day hospital readmissions. Findings suggest that health systems may wish to reconsider the utility of universal use of PDC. Background: Postdischarge contacts (PDCs) after hospitalization are common practice, but their effectiveness in reducing use of acute care after discharge remains unclear. Purpose: To assess the effects of PDC on 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, 30-day hospital readmissions, and patient satisfaction. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL searched from 2012 to 25 May 2023. Study Selection: Randomized and nonrandomized trials of PDC within 7 days. Data Extraction: Two investigators independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias (ROB). Single reviewers extracted data, with verification by second investigators. Random-effects meta-analyses were done on outcomes shared by at least 3 studies, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. Data Synthesis: Of 13 included studies (11 randomized trials [RTs]), 12 delivered PDCs via telephone. Three of 11 RTs were rated as having low ROB, with 1 rated high. Most PDC interventions (n = 10) consisted of single telephone contacts, often within 3 days. Eight studies focused on patients identified as higher-risk by the authors. There were no differences in 30-day ED use (5 RTs; 3054 patients; risk difference, 0.00 [95% CI, −0.02 to 0.03]; moderate certainty) or 30-day hospital readmissions (7 RTs; 7075 patients; risk difference, 0.00 [CI, −0.02 to 0.02]; moderate certainty) with PDC. Limitation: Adherence and fidelity to PDC interventions were poorly described, and only 1 study investigated nontelephone PDC. Conclusion: Postdischarge contacts within 7 days of discharge were not associated with reductions in 30-day ED use or readmissions compared with usual care. Health systems should reconsider the utility of universal PDCs because multifaceted interventions targeting higher-risk patients may be necessary to reduce use of acute care after discharge. Primary Funding Source: Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO: CRD42023465675) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Annals of Internal Medicine is the property of American College of Physicians and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
