Bibliographic Details
Title: |
Assessment and repeatability of aerobic capacity using the Chester Step Test among current, former, and never smokers. |
Authors: |
Caci, Grazia, Spicuzza, Lucia, Emma, Rosalia, Campagna, Davide, Nadir, Meera, Anastasi, Erika, Pennisi, Francesco, Hunter, Stanley, Bhide, Shivraj, Polosa, Riccardo |
Source: |
Internal & Emergency Medicine; Jan2025, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p297-305, 9p |
Abstract: |
Cigarette smoking contributes to reduced cardiorespiratory performance, which may improve upon cessation. Consequently, former smokers' cardiorespiratory fitness should not be significantly different from that of never-smokers. This study aims to compare V̇O2max values among current, former, and never smokers and assess the repeatability of measurements using the Chester Step Test (CST). V̇O2max measurements were available from a total of 70 subjects (23 current, 23 former, and 24 never-smokers) and showed significant repeatability. Current smokers had the worst aerobic capacity, with a mean VO2max ± SD of 38.8 ± 4.5, which was significantly lower than the VO2max of 41.62 ± 3.8 in never-smokers (p < 0.0001) and 41.43 ± 4.6 in former smokers (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed between never-smokers and former smokers. V̇O2max estimates by CST were reproducible and showed that the aerobic capacity of individuals who smoke is substantially inferior compared to never and former smokers. Improvement in cardiorespiratory performance following smoking cessation may have important implications for smoking cessation, especially for those smokers who perceive enhanced physical performance as a tangible benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Internal & Emergency Medicine is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
Database: |
Complementary Index |