| Title: |
Long-term Double-J stenting is superior to short-term Single-J stenting in kidney transplantation. |
| Authors: |
Oudmaijer, Christiaan A. J., Muller, Kelly, van Straalen, Erika, Minnee, Robert C., Kimenai, Diederik J. A. N., Reinders, Marlies E. J., van de Wetering, Jacqueline, IJzermans, Jan N. M., Terkivatan, Turkan |
| Source: |
PLoS ONE; 1/30/2025, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p |
| Subject Terms: |
KIDNEY transplant complications, URINARY tract infections, KIDNEY transplantation, HOSPITAL admission & discharge, LOGISTIC regression analysis |
| Abstract: |
Background and objectives: Urological complications after kidney transplantation, due to the ureteroneocystostomy, are associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stay and even mortality. Ureteral stents can minimize the number of complications but are not consistently used, as previous studies were retrospective in nature. We aim to prospectively determine the most effective stenting approach. Methods: We performed a non-blinded single-centre randomised controlled trial in an academic hospital. Kidney transplant recipients were randomised to either a Single-J stent or a Double-J stent, removed according to respective protocols. Primary outcome was PCN placement within six months. Secondary outcomes encompassed urinary tract infections, cost-effectiveness, and hospital admission time. The study was conducted from November 2018 to August 2023, during which 300 recipients were included with complete follow-up. Results: PCN was performed in 14.5% in the Single-J group (21/145) and 4.5% in the Double-J group (7/155), p = 0.003. Multivariable logistic regression, corrected for recipient age, BMI, sex, and donor type, showed an OR of 0.26 [0.10, 0.61] (OR [95%CI]). To prevent PCN in one recipient, 10 would have to receive the Double-J. All secondary outcomes were comparable, whereas hospital admission time and cost-effectiveness analysis heavily favoured Double-J stenting. An important limitation was that Single-J participants were unable to leave, even if their recovery allowed earlier discharge. Conclusion: This trial showed that Double-J stenting consistently reduced urological complications from 14.5% to 4.5%, while being highly cost-effective. Transplant surgeons should favour Double-J stenting to minimise the risk of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
