Clinical validity of IntelliSpace Cognition digital assessment platform in mild cognitive impairment.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Clinical validity of IntelliSpace Cognition digital assessment platform in mild cognitive impairment.
Authors: Huijbers, Willem, Pinter, Nandor K., Spaltman, Mandy, Cornelis, Mike, Schmand, Ben, Alnaji, Baraa, Yargeau, Maxwell, Harlock, Sarah, Dorn, Ryu Platinum, Ajtai, Bela, Westphal, Erica S., van Elswijk, Gijs
Source: Frontiers in Psychology; 2025, p1-11, 11p
Subject Terms: EXECUTIVE function, ALZHEIMER'S disease, MILD cognitive impairment, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL tests, MINI-Mental State Examination
Abstract: We evaluated a digital cognitive assessment platform, Philips IntelliSpace Cognition, in a case-control study of patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and cognitively normal (CN) older adults. Performance on individual neuropsychological tests, cognitive z -scores, and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-specific composite scores was compared between the CN and MCI groups. These groups were matched for age, sex, and education. Performance on all but two neuropsychological tests was worse in the MCI group. After ranking the cognitive scores by effect size, we found that the memory score was the most impaired, followed by executive functioning. The Early AD/MCI Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (EMACC) and Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC) scores were constructed from the digital tests on Philips IntelliSpace Cognition. Both AD-specific composite scores showed greater sensitivity and specificity than the Mini-Mental State Examination or individual cognitive z -scores. Together, these results demonstrate the diagnostic value of Philips IntelliSpace Cognition in patients with MCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Frontiers in Psychology is the property of Frontiers Media S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:16641078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451843
Published in:Frontiers in Psychology
Language:English