Effects of dual-task paradigm on the injury potential during landing among individuals with chronic ankle instability.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Effects of dual-task paradigm on the injury potential during landing among individuals with chronic ankle instability.
Authors: Zhong, Cheng, Luo, Xin, Gao, He, Zhang, Teng, Zhu, Xiaoxue, Huang, Xueke, Shen, Peixin
Source: Frontiers in Physiology; 2024, p1-9, 9p
Subject Terms: CHRONIC ankle instability, DUAL-task paradigm, ANGULAR velocity, CENTRAL nervous system, MOTION capture (Human mechanics)
Abstract: Purpose: Chronic ankle instability (CAI) causes maladaptive neuroplastic changes in the central nervous system, which may lead to high injury potential under dual-task conditions. This study aims to explore the effects of dual-task paradigm on the injury potential during landing among individuals with CAI. Methods: Twenty participants with CAI (4 female and 16 male, 12 were affected with their right limbs and 8 were affected with their left limbs, 20.4 ± 1.7 years, 176.9 ± 5.0 cm, and 72.0 ± 11.1 kg) and eighteen without CAI (6 female and 12 male, 20.2 ± 1.5 years, 173.5 ± 7.0 cm, and 70.3 ± 10.8 kg) were recruited. They drop-landed on a trap-door device, with their affected or matched limbs on a flippable platform, under single- (drop-landing only) and dual-task (drop-landing while subtracting of serial threes) conditions. A twelve-camera motion capture system was used to capture the kinematic data. Two-way ANOVA with mixed design (CAI vs non-CAI groups by single-vs dual-task conditions) was used to analyze the data. Results: Significant group-by-condition interactions were detected in the ankle inversion angle (P = 0.040, η 2 p = 0.012) and ankle inversion angular velocity (P = 0.038, η 2 p = 0.114). Both indicators decreased among individuals without CAI from single-to dual-task conditions, while remained unchanged among those with CAI; and they were higher among individuals with CAI under both single- and dual-task conditions, compared to those without CAI. Conclusion: Individuals with CAI have a reduced ability to limit ankle inversion compared to those without CAI. Under dual-task conditions, individuals without CAI limited their ankle inversion, while those with CAI did not. Drop-landing, especially under dual-task conditions, poses a high risk of excessive ankle inversion for individuals with CAI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Frontiers in Physiology is the property of Frontiers Media S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:1664042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1473844
Published in:Frontiers in Physiology
Language:English