Changes in social environment impact primate gut microbiota composition.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Changes in social environment impact primate gut microbiota composition.
Authors: Pearce, Colleen S., Bukovsky, Danielle, Douchant, Katya, Katoch, Abhay, Greenlaw, Jill, Gale, Daniel J., Nashed, Joseph Y., Brien, Don, Kuhlmeier, Valerie A., Sabbagh, Mark A., Blohm, Gunnar, De Felice, Fernanda G., Pare, Martin, Cook, Douglas J., Scott, Stephen H., Munoz, Douglas P., Sjaarda, Calvin P., Tusche, Anita, Sheth, Prameet M., Winterborn, Andrew
Source: Animal Microbiome; 11/13/2024, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p1-15, 15p
Subject Terms: SOCIAL impact, SOCIAL history, GUT microbiome, WELL-being, SOCIAL change
Abstract: Background: The gut microbiota (GM) has proven to be essential for both physical health and mental wellbeing, yet the forces that ultimately shape its composition remain opaque. One critical force known to affect the GM is the social environment. Prior work in humans and free-ranging non-human primates has shown that cohabitation and frequent social interaction can lead to changes in GM composition. However, it is difficult to assess the direction of causation in these studies, and interpretations are complicated by the influence of uncontrolled but correlated factors, such as shared diet. Results: We performed a 15-month longitudinal investigation wherein we disentangled the impacts of diet and social living conditions on GM composition in a captive cohort of 13 male cynomolgus macaques. The animals were in single housing for the first 3 months of the study initially with a variable diet. After baseline data collection they were placed on a controlled diet for the remainder of the study. Following this diet shift the animals were moved to paired housing for 6 months, enabling enhanced social interaction, and then subsequently returned to single housing at the end of our study. This structured sequencing of diet and housing changes allowed us to assess their distinct impacts on GM composition. We found that the early dietary adjustments led to GM changes in both alpha and beta diversity, whereas changes in social living conditions only altered beta diversity. With respect to the latter, we found that two particular bacterial families — Lactobacillaceae and Clostridiaceae — demonstrated significant shifts in abundance during the transition from single housing to paired housing, which was distinct from the shifts we observed based on a change in diet. Conversely, we found that other bacteria previously associated with sociality were not altered based on changes in social living conditions but rather only by changes in diet. Conclusions: Together, these findings decouple the influences that diet and social living have on GM composition and reconcile previous observations in the human and animal literatures. Moreover, the results indicate biological alterations of the gut that may, in part, mediate the relationship between sociality and wellbeing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Animal Microbiome is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:25244671
DOI:10.1186/s42523-024-00355-y
Published in:Animal Microbiome
Language:English