Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Are YouTube™ Videos Useful for Patients? An Evaluation of YouTube™ Videos on Zygomatic Implants. |
| Authors: |
Akti, Ahmet, Cengiz, Ziya Ozan, Gurses, Gokhan, Kaya, Dogan Ilgaz |
| Source: |
Medical Records; 2024, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p389-395, 7p |
| Subject Terms: |
DENTAL implants, SOCIAL media, CROSS-sectional method, PEARSON correlation (Statistics), DATA analysis, STATISTICAL significance, HEALTH, KRUSKAL-Wallis Test, INFORMATION resources, CHI-squared test, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, ZYGOMA, STATISTICS, INTRACLASS correlation, DATA analysis software, VIDEO recording, ORAL health, INTER-observer reliability |
| Geographic Terms: |
UNITED States, INDIA, SPAIN |
| Abstract: |
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of information provided by YouTube™ videos on zygomatic implants. Material and Method: YouTube™ videos were searched using the keyword "Zygomatic implants". The first 200 videos were analyzed. After exclusion, the remaining 94 videos were independently analyzed by two investigators for demographic characteristics and content usefulness. All videos were rated as poor, fair, or excellent based on a usefulness score that assessed the quality and flow of the content. Overall video ratings included duration, views, likes, dislikes, and comments. Video content was analyzed using an 8-point scoring list. All videos were categorized according to their source. Categorical data were analyzed using Pearson's chisquared test. For non-normally distributed data, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for between-group comparisons, and post-hoc Dunn's test was used for multiple comparisons. The significance level was set at p<0.050. Results: Analysis of the video upload locations showed that the highest rate was from the USA (51.1%), followed by India (21.3%) and Spain (5.3%). Regarding the source of the uploaded videos, 11.7% were educational videos produced by doctors, 54.2% were patient information videos, and 34% were promotional videos. There was a statistically significant difference in the median number of views, likes, and dislikes depending on the source of the video upload (p<0.001), but no statistically significant difference was found in other video parameters. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals should evaluate YouTube™ videos on zygomatic implants for clinical accuracy and content quality, and recommend videos to patients that meet professional standards and achieve the intended educational goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Medical Records is the property of Medical Records and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
