Test–retest reliability and reliable change index of the Philips IntelliSpace Cognition digital test battery.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Test–retest reliability and reliable change index of the Philips IntelliSpace Cognition digital test battery.
Authors: Klaming, Laura, Spaltman, Mandy, Vermeent, Stefan, van Elswijk, Gijs, Miller, Justin B., Schmand, Ben
Source: Clinical Neuropsychologist; Oct2024, Vol. 38 Issue 7, p1707-1725, 19p
Subject Terms: COGNITIVE neuroscience, COGNITIVE testing, INTRACLASS correlation, STATISTICAL reliability, TEST reliability
Abstract: Objective: This article provides the test–retest reliability and Reliable Change Indices (RCIs) of the Philips IntelliSpace Cognition (ISC) platform, which contains digitized versions of well-established neuropsychological tests. Method: 147 participants (ages 19 to 88) completed a digital cognitive test battery on the ISC platform or paper-pencil versions of the same test battery during two separate visits. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated separately for the ISC and analog test versions to compare reliabilities between administration modalities. RCIs were calculated for the digital tests using the practice-adjusted RCI and standardized regression-based (SRB) method. Results: Test–retest reliabilities for the ISC tests ranged from moderate to excellent and were comparable to the test-retest reliabilities for the paper-pencil tests. Baseline test performance, retest interval, age, and education predicted test performance at visit 2 with baseline test performance being the strongest predictor for all outcome measures. For most outcome measures, both methods for the calculation of RCIs show agreement on whether or not a reliable change was observed. Conclusions: RCIs for the digital tests enable clinicians to determine whether a measured change between assessments is due to real improvement or decline. Together, this contributes to the growing evidence for the clinical utility of the ISC platform. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Clinical Neuropsychologist is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:13854046
DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2315747
Published in:Clinical Neuropsychologist
Language:English