Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Construction of sensitive quality indicators for rapid rehabilitation care of patients after combined pancreaticoduodenectomy. |
| Authors: |
Feng, Rui, Yan, Pan, He, Fang, Liu, Jiao, Fu, Xifeng, Jin, Congcong, Li, Chao, Liu, Yan, Wang, Lin, Li, Min |
| Source: |
BMC Nursing; 9/19/2024, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p1-15, 15p |
| Subject Terms: |
NURSING audit, CLINICAL medicine, NURSES, MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems, SCALE analysis (Psychology), EVIDENCE-based nursing, MORTALITY, MEDICAL quality control, PATIENTS, RESEARCH funding, PATIENT safety, STRUCTURAL models, KEY performance indicators (Management), INTERVIEWING, QUESTIONNAIRES, READABILITY (Literary style), NURSING education, NURSING, JUDGMENT sampling, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, CHI-squared test, PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY, NURSING services administration, MEDLINE, MEDICAL rehabilitation, RESEARCH methodology, MEDICAL databases, STATISTICS, DELPHI method, ONLINE information services, PHENOMENOLOGY, DATA analysis software, REHABILITATION |
| Abstract: |
Aim: To construct evidence-based sensitive quality indicators for patients' rapid rehabilitation care after combined pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and to provide a reference for clinical nursing professionals to scientifically evaluate the quality of patients' rehabilitation post-PD. Background: Since PD is associated with higher surgical risk and anastomotic complications, it leads to higher complication rates and longer postoperative recovery cycles. This reiterates the need for rapid recovery of patients after PD; however, the evaluation of sensitive nursing care indicators regarding rapid recovery post-PD has not yet been established to date. Methods: Based on the Donabedian structure-process-result theory model, we used available literature, semi-structured interviews, the Delphi method, and hierarchical analysis to establish a sensitive indicator system for patients' rapid rehabilitation after PD and evaluate the importance of such indicators. Results: There were two rounds of expert correspondence, and the effective recovery rate of the questionnaires of these rounds was 100%. The expert authority coefficients, as well as the Kendall coordination coefficients of the expert opinions, were 0.859 and 0.872 as well as 0.423 and 0.431, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), respectively. Consequently, we developed a sensitive quality index system for patients' rapid rehabilitation care after combined PD, including 3 first-level, 12 s-level, and 23 third-level indexes, respectively. Conclusion: The constructed sensitive quality index system developed for patients' rapid rehabilitation nursing care after combined PD is standardized, practical, and aligned with the specialty characteristics. Furthermore, this might help greatly in improving the quality and safety of patients' rapid rehabilitation nursing care after combined PD, standardizing nursing management skills, and enhancing nursing quality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of BMC Nursing is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
