Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Exploring patients' experience using PROMs within routine post-discharge follow-up assessment after stroke: a mixed methods approach. |
| Authors: |
Mourits, B.M.P., den Hartog, S.J., de Graaf, J.A., Roozenbeek, B., Post, M.W.M., Visser-Meily, J.M.A., Scholten, E.W.M. |
| Source: |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes; 4/26/2024, Vol. 8, p1-10, 10p |
| Subject Terms: |
ACADEMIC medical centers, QUESTIONNAIRES, INTERVIEWING, SCIENTIFIC observation, DISCHARGE planning, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, LONGITUDINAL method, ISCHEMIC stroke, PHYSICIAN-patient relations, RESEARCH methodology, TELEPHONES, STROKE patients, HEALTH outcome assessment, PSYCHOLOGICAL tests, BARTHEL Index, PSYCHOSOCIAL factors, PATIENTS' attitudes, PATIENT aftercare, MEDICAL referrals, EVALUATION |
| Geographic Terms: |
NETHERLANDS |
| Abstract: |
Background: Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) are being used increasingly to measure health problems in stroke clinical practice. However, the implementation of these PROMs in routine stroke care is still in its infancy. To understand the value of PROMs used in ischemic stroke care, we explored the patients' experience with PROMs and with the consultation at routine post-discharge follow-up after stroke. Methods: In this prospective mixed methods study, patients with ischemic stroke completed an evaluation questionnaire about the use of PROMs and about their consultation in two Dutch hospitals. Additionally, telephone interviews were held to gain in-depth information about their experience with PROMs. Results: In total, 63 patients completed the evaluation questionnaire of which 10 patients were also interviewed. Most patients (82.2–96.6%) found completing the PROMs to be feasible and relevant. Half the patients (49.2–51.6%) considered the PROMs useful for the consultation and most patients (87.3–96.8%) reported the consultation as a positive experience. Completing the PROMs provided 51.6% of the patients with insight into their stroke-related problems. Almost 75% of the patients found the PROMs useful in giving the healthcare provider greater insight, and 60% reported discussing the PROM results during the consultation. Interviewed patients reported the added value of PROMs, particularly when arranging further care, in gaining a broader insight into the problems, and in ensuring all important topics were discussed during the consultation. Conclusions: Completing PROMs appears to be feasible for patients with stroke attending post-discharge consultation; the vast majority of patients experienced added value for themselves or the healthcare provider. We recommend that healthcare providers discuss the PROM results with their patients to improve the value of PROMs for the patient. This could also improve the willingness to complete PROMs in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
