Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Ultrasonographic diagnosis of adnexal masses: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of videos, using IOTA terminology. |
| Authors: |
Massobrio, Roberta, Mariani, Luca Liban, Conti, Daniele, De Grandis, Tiziana, Buonomo, Francesca, Badellino, Enrico, Novara, Lorenzo, Bounous, Valentina Elisabetta, Perotto, Stefania, Mancarella, Matteo, Ferrero, Annamaria, Biglia, Nicoletta, Fuso, Luca |
| Source: |
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics; Jan2024, Vol. 309 Issue 1, p211-218, 8p |
| Subject Terms: |
ADNEXAL diseases, PEARSON correlation (Statistics), TUMOR classification, TERMS & phrases, RECEIVER operating characteristic curves |
| Abstract: |
Objectives: Aim of this study is to estimate interobserver agreement in classifying adnexal tumors using IOTA terms, simple rules and subjective assessment. In addition, we related observers' accuracy with their experience in gynecological ultrasonography and the year of IOTA certification. Methods: Eleven observers with three different levels of experience evaluated videoclips of 70 adnexal masses, defining tumor type according to IOTA terms and definitions, classifying the mass using IOTA Simple rules and Subjective assessment as well as providing Color Score evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve were calculated and the year of IOTA certification was related with operators' accuracy through Pearson correlation coefficient. Interobserver agreement was estimated calculating percentage of agreement, Fleiss kappa and Cohen's kappa. Results: We found a positive correlation between the year of IOTA certification and operators' accuracy (Pearson coefficient 0.694), especially among the observers with the least experience, the residents (p = 0.003). For tumor type classification, identification of papillary projections and classification of tumors using subjective assessment, agreement among all observers was moderate (Fleiss kappa 0.455, 0.552, and 0.476, respectively) and increased with the years of experience. Agreement in the application of Simple Rules was moderate in all examiners with IOTA certification, with Fleiss kappa in the range of (0.403, 0.498). For Color Score assignment interobserver agreement among all observers was fair (Cohen's kappa 0.380). Conclusions: Even among expert examiners, the results of adnexal lesion assessment can be inconsistent. Experience impacts on accuracy and agreement in subjective assessment, while the application of Simple Rules can mitigate the role of experience in interobserver agreement. The knowledge of IOTA models among residents seams to improve their diagnostic accuracy, showing the benefits of IOTA terminology for in training sonographers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
