The Use of Indocyanine Green to Visualize the Thoracic Duct and Evaluate Gastric Conduit Perfusion in Esophagectomy.

Bibliographic Details
Title: The Use of Indocyanine Green to Visualize the Thoracic Duct and Evaluate Gastric Conduit Perfusion in Esophagectomy.
Authors: Aw, Katherine, Al Rawahi, Aziza, Lau, Rebecca, Abdul, Sami Aftab, Anstee, Caitlin, Gilbert, Sebastien, Jones, Daniel, Seely, Andrew J. E., Sundaresan, Ramanadhan Sudhir, Villeneuve, Patrick James, Maziak, Donna Elizabeth
Source: Surgeries (2673-4095); Dec2023, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p579-589, 11p
Subject Terms: THORACIC duct, INDOCYANINE green, ESOPHAGECTOMY, PERFUSION, SURGICAL complications
Abstract: Background: In this study, we investigate indocyanine green (ICG) dye visualization of the thoracic duct (TD) and conduit perfusion during esophagectomy to reduce anastomotic leak (AL) and chylothorax adverse events (AEs). Methods: Retrospective data of adult patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between July 2019 and 2022 were included (n = 105). ICG was delivered intravenously (2 mL, 2.5 mg/mL) to assess conduit perfusion into the small bowel mesentery, inguinal lymph nodes, or foot web spaces for TD visualization using fluorescence imaging. Incidence of TD injury, chylothorax, AL, and AEs were collected. Results: A total of 23 patients received ICG (ICG for TD and perfusion (n = 12) and perfusion only (n = 11)), while 82 patients were controls. TD was visualized in 6 of 12 patients who received ICG for TD. No intraoperative TD injuries or postoperative chylothoraces occurred in these patients. Non-ICG patients had 1 (1.22%) intraoperative TD injury and 10 (12.2%) postoperative chylothoraces (grade I–IIIb). While 10 non-ICG patients (12.2%) developed AL (grade I–IVb), only 2 (8.7%) ICG patients developed AL (grade IIIa). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of ICG fluorescence in intraoperative TD and conduit perfusion assessment for limiting AEs. Standard incorporation of ICG in esophagectomy may help surgeons improve the quality of care in this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Surgeries (2673-4095) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:26734095
DOI:10.3390/surgeries4040056
Published in:Surgeries (2673-4095)
Language:English