Six-month cost-effectiveness of adding motivational interviewing or a stratified vocational advice intervention to usual case management for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: the MI-NAV economic evaluation.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Six-month cost-effectiveness of adding motivational interviewing or a stratified vocational advice intervention to usual case management for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: the MI-NAV economic evaluation.
Authors: Tingulstad, Alexander, Maas, Esther T., Rysstad, Tarjei, Øiestad, Britt Elin, Aanesen, Fiona, Pripp, Are Hugo, Van Tulder, Maurits W., Grotle, Margreth
Source: Journal of Occupational Medicine & Toxicology; 11/14/2023, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p1-11, 11p
Subject Terms: MUSCULOSKELETAL system diseases, SICK leave, CONFIDENCE intervals, MOTIVATIONAL interviewing, WORK-related injuries, COST benefit analysis, EMPLOYEES, COMPARATIVE studies, COST effectiveness, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, RESEARCH funding, VOCATIONAL rehabilitation, MEDICAL case management, FINANCIAL management, EMPLOYMENT reentry, QUALITY-adjusted life years
Abstract: Objectives: This study evaluates the six-month cost-effectiveness and cost-benefits of motivational interviewing (MI) or a stratified vocational advice intervention (SVAI) added to usual case management (UC) for workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: This study was conducted alongside a three-arm RCT including 514 employed workers on sick leave for at least 50% for ≥ 7 weeks. All participants received UC. The UC + MI group received two MI sessions, and the UC + SVAI group received 1–4 SVAI sessions. Sickness absence days, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and societal costs were measured between baseline and six months. Results: Adding MI to UC, resulted in incremental cost-reduction of -2580EUR (95%CI -5687;612), and a reduction in QALYs of -0.001 (95%CI -0.02;0.01). Secondly, adding MI to UC resulted in an incremental cost-reduction of -538EUR (95%CI -1358;352), and reduction of 5.08 (95%CI -3.3;13.5) sickness-absence days. Financial return estimates were positive, but not statistically significant. Adding SVAI to UC, resulted in an incremental cost-reduction of -2899 EUR (95% CI -5840;18), and a reduction in QALYs of 0.002 (95% CI -0.02;0.01). Secondly, adding SVAI to UC resulted in an statistically significant incremental cost-reduction of -695 EUR (95% CI -1459;-3), and a reduction of 7.9 (95% CI -0.04;15.9) sickness absence days. Financial return estimates were positive and statistically significant. The probabilities of cost-effectiveness for QALYs were high for adding MI or SVAI (ceiling ratio 0.90). Conclusions: In comparison to UC only, adding MI to UC tends to be cost-effective. Adding SVAI to UC is cost-effective for workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03871712). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Occupational Medicine & Toxicology is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:17456673
DOI:10.1186/s12995-023-00394-2
Published in:Journal of Occupational Medicine & Toxicology
Language:English