| Title: |
Effect of cerebrospinal fluid drainage pressure in descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repair: a prospective multicenter observational study. |
| Authors: |
Yoshitani, Kenji, Ogata, Soshiro, Kato, Shinya, Tsukinaga, Akito, Takatani, Tsunenori, Kin, Nobuhide, Ezaka, Mariko, Shimizu, Jun, Furuichi, Yuko, Uezono, Shoichi, Kida, Kotaro, Seo, Katsuhiro, Kakumoto, Shinichi, Miyawaki, Hiroshi, Kawamata, Mikito, Tanaka, Satoshi, Kakinohana, Manabu, Izumi, Shunsuke, Uchino, Hiroyuki, Kakinuma, Takayasu |
| Source: |
Journal of Anesthesia; Jun2023, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p408-415, 8p |
| Subject Terms: |
CEREBROSPINAL fluid leak, ENDOVASCULAR aneurysm repair, FLUID pressure, EVOKED potentials (Electrophysiology), AORTA, CEREBROSPINAL fluid shunts |
| Abstract: |
Purpose: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is recommended during open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair. However, the incidence of CSFD complications is still high. Recently, CSF pressure has been kept high to avoid complications, but the efficacy of CSFD at higher pressures has not been confirmed. We hypothesize that CSFD at higher pressures is effective for preventing motor deficits. Methods: This prospective observational study included 14 hospitals that are members of the Japanese Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Patients who underwent thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair were divided into four groups: Group 1, CSF pressure around 10 mmHg; Group 2, CSF pressure around 15 mmHg; Group 3, CSFD initiated when motor evoked potential amplitudes decreased; and Group 4, no CSFD. We assessed the association between the CSFD group and motor deficits using mixed-effects logistic regression with a random intercept for the institution. Results: Of 1072 patients in the study, 84 patients (open surgery, 51; thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 33) had motor deficits at discharge. Groups 1 and 2 were not associated with motor deficits (Group 1, odds ratio (OR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.71–3.29, p = 0.276; Group 2, OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.62–4.82) when compared with Group 4. Group 3 was significantly more prone to motor deficits than Group 4 (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.27–5.17, p = 0.009). Conclusion: CSFD is not associated with motor deficits in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic repair with CSF pressure around 10 or 15 mmHg. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Anesthesia is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
