Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: a non-invasive FFR computed tomography study. |
| Authors: |
Kazawa, Shuichiro, de Asmundis, Carlo, Al Housari, Maysam, Bala, Gezim, Sieira, Juan, Belsack, Dries, De Mey, Johan, Lochy, Stijn, Vandeloo, Bert, Argacha, Jean-François, Brugada, Pedro, Chierchia, Gian-Battista, Tanaka, Kaoru, Ströker, Erwin |
| Source: |
Heart & Vessels; Jun2023, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p757-763, 7p |
| Subject Terms: |
ATRIAL flutter, CORONARY artery disease, ATRIAL fibrillation, ATRIAL arrhythmias, CORONARY angiography, CARDIOGRAPHIC tomography |
| Abstract: |
To evaluate coronary artery disease (CAD) with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring ablation. The study population consisted of 151 patients who underwent CTCA before AF ablation (AF group), and a control group of 151 patients from the outpatient clinic who underwent CTCA without any history of AF (non-AF group), matched for age, sex, BMI, and angina symptomatology. All study patients underwent CTCA with subdivision of coronary lesion type into severe (≥ 70% luminal narrowing), moderate (50% ≤ luminal narrowing < 70%), and mild stenosis (< 50% luminal narrowing). In patients with ≥ 1 moderate or severe stenosis, non-invasive FFR was calculated from CTCA (FFRCT). Baseline characteristics and CAD risk factors were similar between the 2 groups. During CTCA, 38% of the patients in the AF group were in ongoing atrial arrhythmia (either AF or regular atrial tachycardia). The number of patients with severe (10 (6.6%) vs 10 (6.6%), P = 1.00), moderate (14 (9.5%) vs 10 (6.7%), P = 0.4), and mild stenosis (43 (28.5%) vs 56 (37.1%), P = 0.11) was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Performance of FFRCT was feasible in 32/44 patients (73%), and failed in 27% of the patients (7 and 5 patients in the AF and non-AF group, respectively, P = 0.74). No difference was observed in the prevalence of hemodynamically significant stenosis (FFRCT ≤ 0.80) (15 (9.9%) vs 12 (7.9%), P = 0.85). Our study showed technical feasibility of CTCA in all patients of both groups, including the patients with AF as presenting rhythm. The FFRCT add-on analysis failed equally frequent in patients of the AF versus non-AF group. An equal rate of CAD was observed in the AF group and non-AF group, favoring the concept of shared associated risk factors for CAD and AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Heart & Vessels is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
