Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of Knotless and Knotted Single-Anchor Repair for Ruptures of the Upper Subscapularis Tendon: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up.
Authors: Sgroi, Mirco, Kranz, Marilena, Seitz, Andreas Martin, Ludwig, Marius, Faschingbauer, Martin, Zippelius, Timo, Reichel, Heiko, Kappe, Thomas
Source: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine; Mar2022, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p1-8, 8p
Subject Terms: ROTATOR cuff surgery, SUTURING, MAGNETIC resonance imaging, RETROSPECTIVE studies, TREATMENT effectiveness, COMPARATIVE studies, QUESTIONNAIRES, TENDON rupture, TENODESIS
Abstract: Background: Both knotted and knotless single-anchor repair techniques are used to repair transmural ruptures of the upper subscapularis (SSC) tendon. However, it is still unclear which technique provides better clinical and radiological results. Purpose/Hypothesis: To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of knotless and knotted single-anchor repair techniques in patients with a transmural rupture of the upper SSC tendon at 2-year follow-up. It was hypothesized that the 2 techniques would not differ significantly in outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Forty patients with a transmural tear of the upper SSC tendon (grade 2 or 3 according to Fox and Romeo) were retrospectively enrolled. Depending on the repair technique, patients were assigned to either the knotless single-anchor or knotted single-anchor group. After a mean follow-up of 2.33 ± 0.43 years, patients were assessed by the ASES, WORC, OSS, CS, and SSV. A clinical examination that included the bear-hug, the lift-off, and the belly-press tests was performed, in which the force exerted by the subjects was measured. In addition, all patients underwent MRI of the affected shoulder to assess repair integrity, tendon width, fatty infiltration, signal-to-signal ratio of the upper and lower SSC muscle, and atrophy of the SSC muscle. Results: No significant difference was found between the 2 groups on any of the clinical scores [ASES (P =.272), WORC (P =.523), OSS (P =.401), CS (P =.328), SSV (P =.540)] or on the range-of-motion or force measurements. Apart from a higher signal-to-signal ratio of the lower SSC muscle in the knotless group (P =.017), no significant difference on imaging outcomes was found between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Both techniques can be used in surgical practice, as neither was found to be superior to the other in terms of clinical or imaging outcomes at 2-year follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Complementary Index
More Details
ISSN:23259671
DOI:10.1177/23259671221083591
Published in:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Language:English