Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Performance of a guideline-recommended algorithm for prognostication of poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. |
| Authors: |
Moseby-Knappe, Marion, Westhall, Erik, Backman, Sofia, Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas, Dragancea, Irina, Lybeck, Anna, Friberg, Hans, Stammet, Pascal, Lilja, Gisela, Horn, Janneke, Kjaergaard, Jesper, Rylander, Christian, Hassager, Christian, Ullén, Susann, Nielsen, Niklas, Cronberg, Tobias |
| Source: |
Intensive Care Medicine; Oct2020, Vol. 46 Issue 10, p1852-1862, 11p, 3 Diagrams, 2 Charts |
| Subject Terms: |
ALGORITHMS, CARDIAC arrest, GLASGOW Coma Scale, ENOLASE, CRITICAL care medicine |
| Abstract: |
Purpose: To assess the performance of a 4-step algorithm for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest recommended by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Methods: Retrospective descriptive analysis with data from the Target Temperature Management (TTM) Trial. Associations between predicted and actual neurological outcome were investigated for each step of the algorithm with results from clinical neurological examinations, neuroradiology (CT or MRI), neurophysiology (EEG and SSEP) and serum neuron-specific enolase. Patients examined with Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score (GCS-M) on day 4 (72–96 h) post-arrest and available 6-month outcome were included. Poor outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Category 3–5. Variations of the ERC/ESICM algorithm were explored within the same cohort. Results: The ERC/ESICM algorithm identified poor outcome patients with 38.7% sensitivity (95% CI 33.1–44.7) and 100% specificity (95% CI 98.8–100) in a cohort of 585 patients. An alternative cut-off for serum neuron-specific enolase, an alternative EEG-classification and variations of the GCS-M had minor effects on the sensitivity without causing false positive predictions. The highest overall sensitivity, 42.5% (95% CI 36.7–48.5), was achieved when prognosticating patients irrespective of GCS-M score, with 100% specificity (95% CI 98.8–100) remaining. Conclusion: The ERC/ESICM algorithm and all exploratory multimodal variations thereof investigated in this study predicted poor outcome without false positive predictions and with sensitivities 34.6–42.5%. Our results should be validated prospectively, preferably in patients where withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy is uncommon to exclude any confounding from self-fulfilling prophecies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Intensive Care Medicine is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
