Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Perbandingan Secara Anatomi Insang Ikan Keureling (Tor tambroides), Ikan Mas (Cyprinus carpio) dan Ikan Nila, (Oreochromis niloticus). (Indonesian) |
| Alternate Title: |
ANATOMICAL COMPARISON OF GILLS OF THAI MAHSEER'S (TOR TAMBROIDES), CARP (CYPRINUS CARPIO) AND TILAPIA, (OREOCHROMIS NILOTICUS. (English) |
| Authors: |
Ernita, Munawir, Faumi, Resti, Akmal, Yusrizal, Muliari, Zulfahmi, Ilham |
| Source: |
Jurnal Veteriner; 2020, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p234-246, 13p |
| Abstract (English): |
This study aims to describe the anatomical differences in the gills of the thai mahseer's (Tor tambroides), carp (Cyprinus carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The stages of this study include the preparation of test fish, preparation of gill, documentation, identification, and analysis. This study used five fish for each type of fish with total weight ranged from 500-1000 g and length 28 to 40 cm. Analysis of each gill section was carried out morphology and morphometric. Morphometric data on the arcus branchialis section observed included the ratio of branchial arcus length to total length, on the part of the branchial filament kekeincluding the average number of branchialis filaments per branchial arcus, density of branchialis filaments (filaments/cm), and length ratio of branchial filaments with the length of the branchial arcus, while in the branchiospinal part includes the average number of branchiospinalis per branchialis arcus and density of branchiospinalis. Result showed that morphologically, the anatomical differences in keureling gills, carp and tilapia are located in the form of branchiostegal and branchiospinalis membranes. Anatomical differences were seen in relative gill weight, branchial arcus length ratio, branchiospinal density, average number of branchial filaments, average density of branchialis filaments and average number of branchiospinalis. Carp have higher relative weight values of gills compared to tilapia and keureling fish which are 3.73 ± 0.43%, 2.82 ± 0.64% and 1.92 ± 0.55%, respectively. Tilapia has the shape and size of gills that are more developed in supporting the performance of the respiratory system than carp and keureling fish. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Indonesian): |
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perbedaan anatomi insang ikan keureling (Tor tambroides), ikan mas (Cyprinus carpio) dan ikan nila (Oreochromis niloticus). Tahapan penelitian ini meliputi persiapan ikan uji, preparasi anatomi insang, dokumentasi, identifikasi dan analisis. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan untuk masing masing jenis ikan adalah sebanyak lima ekor dengan kisaran bobot antara 500-1000 g dan kisaran panjang antara 28 sampai 40 cm. Pengamatan dilakukan secara morfologi dan morfometrik. Data morfometrik pada bagian arcus branchialis yang diamati meliputi rasio panjang arcus branchialis dengan panjang total, pada bagian filamen branchialis meliputi rata-rata jumlah filamen branchialis per arcus branchialis, rata-rata kerapatan filamen branchialis (filamen/cm), dan rasio panjang filamen branchialis dengan panjang arcus branchialis, sedangkan pada bagian branchiospinalis meliputi rata-rata jumlah branchiospinalis per arcus branchialis dan kerapatan branchiospinalis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara morfologi, perbedaan anatomi insang ikan keureling, ikan mas dan ikan nila terletak pada bentuk membran branchiostegal dan branchiospinalis. Perbedaan morfometrik antar ketiga jenis ikan terlihat pada berat insang relatif, rasio panjang arcus branchialis, rata-rata kerapatan branchiospinalis, rata-rata jumlah filamen branchialis, rata-rata kerapatan filamen branchialis dan rata-rata jumlah branchiospinalis. Ikan mas memiliki nilai berat insang relatif yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan ikan nila dan ikan keureling yaitu masing masing sebesar 3,73 ± 0,43%, 2,82 ± 0,64% dan 1,92 ± 0,55%. Ikan nila memiliki bentuk dan ukuran insang yang lebih berkembang dalam mendukung kinerja sistem respirasi dibandingkan ikan mas dan ikan keureling [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Jurnal Veteriner is the property of Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan, Universitas Udayana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
