Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Comparative evaluation of effect of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems on pericervical dentin: A cone-beam computed tomography study. |
| Authors: |
Zinge, Priyanka Ramdas, Patil, Jayaprakash |
| Source: |
Journal of Conservative Dentistry; Nov/Dec2017, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p424-428, 5p |
| Subject Terms: |
DENTIN, CONE beam computed tomography, DENTAL caries, ENDODONTICS, DENTAL materials |
| Abstract: |
Aim and Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effect of one shape, Neolix rotary single-file systems and WaveOne, Reciproc reciprocating single-file systems on pericervical dentin (PCD) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: A total of 40 freshly extracted mandibular premolars were collected and divided into two groups, namely, Group A - Rotary: A1 - Neolix and A2 - OneShape and Group B - Reciprocating: B1 - WaveOne and B2 - Reciproc. Preoperative scans of each were taken followed by conventional access cavity preparation and working length determination with 10-k file. Instrumentation of the canal was done according to the respective file system, and postinstrumentation CBCT scans of teeth were obtained. 90 μm thick slices were obtained 4 mm apical and coronal to the cementoenamel junction. The PCD thickness was calculated as the shortest distance from the canal outline to the closest adjacent root surface, which was measured in four surfaces, i.e., facial, lingual, mesial, and distal for all the groups in the two obtained scans. Results: There was no significant difference found between rotary single-file systems and reciprocating single-file systems in their effect on PCD, but in Group B2, there was most significant loss of tooth structure in the mesial, lingual, and distal surface (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Reciproc single-file system removes more PCD as compared to other experimental groups, whereas Neolix single file system had the least effect on PCD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Conservative Dentistry is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Complementary Index |
