#EMPLOYERSTOO: EXPANDING VICARIOUS LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN TITLE VII AND TORT LAW.

Bibliographic Details
Title: #EMPLOYERSTOO: EXPANDING VICARIOUS LIABILITY FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN TITLE VII AND TORT LAW.
Authors: Fotiadis, Kassandra "Kassie"1 kassie@umich.edu
Source: Michigan Law Review. Nov2024, Vol. 123 Issue 2, p357-421. 65p.
Subject Terms: *Sexual harassment, Torts, Common law, Appellate courts, Constitutional courts, Violence
Abstract: When an individual experiences sexual harassment through a workplace, she has limited options for recourse.One seemingly promising possibility is bringing a claim against her perpetrator’s employer. But this option—achievable through vicarious liability—has failed to realize its potential. In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard to enforce vicarious liability for sexual harassment claims under Title VII. That standard, though, was limited in scope to begin with and has further narrowed over time. Common law principles also allow courts to hold employers vicariously liable for sexual harassment in tort. But few jurisdictions have adopted those principles, and there is no unified system governing all jurisdictions. This Note makes the case for expanding vicarious liability for sexual harassment claims, both under Title VII and in tort. Workplace sexual harassment is an epidemic that we know more about now than ever before, and that is in dire need of solutions. Expanding vicarious liability is one such way to address sexual harassment, and now is the time to act. Almost a decade out from the #MeToo movement, its accompanying revelations about work and violence, and its resulting individual accountability, this Note contends that employers must be held accountable, too. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Michigan Law Review is the property of Michigan Law Review Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Business Source Complete
More Details
ISSN:00262234
Published in:Michigan Law Review
Language:English