Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Are Financial Statements More Comparable When GAAP Restricts Managers' Discretion? |
| Authors: |
Young, Spencer1 (AUTHOR) spencer.young@ou.edu |
| Source: |
Management Science. Sep2024, Vol. 70 Issue 9, p6280-6301. 22p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Disclosure in accounting, *Financial statements, *Capital costs, *Disclosure laws, *Accounting standards, Discretion |
| Abstract: |
I examine whether financial statements are more comparable when accounting standards restrict managers' discretion. My evidence suggests that restricting managers' discretion is associated with reduced comparability, on average. This effect is strongest when transactions are dissimilar. To explore this relation, I develop novel measures of two distinct types of incomparability. I find that restricting managers' discretion is associated with an increase in incomparability stemming from dissimilar transactions appearing overly similar. Together, these findings suggest that restricting managers' discretion may be more harmful to comparability than is too much diversity in practice. However, I also find evidence that restricting managers' discretion may enhance comparability in two scenarios. Specifically, I find that restricting managers' discretion is associated with improved comparability when standards (1) restrict manipulation of financial reports and (2) eliminate dissimilar accounting treatments that do not reflect differences in the underlying transactions. Overall, these findings nuance our understanding of how the requirements imposed by standard setters influence financial statement comparability. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Funding: Financial support from The School of Accountancy at the University of Arizona and the John T. Steed School of Accounting at the University of Oklahoma is gratefully acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The internet appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4961. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Management Science is the property of INFORMS: Institute for Operations Research & the Management Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Business Source Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
