Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Who guards the guards with AI-driven robots? The ethicalness and cognitive neutralization of police violence following AI-robot advice. |
| Authors: |
Hohensinn, Lisa1 (AUTHOR) lisa.hohensinn@wu.ac.at, Willems, Jurgen1 (AUTHOR), Soliman, Meikel2 (AUTHOR), Vanderelst, Dieter3 (AUTHOR), Stoll, Jonathan1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Public Management Review. Aug2024, Vol. 26 Issue 8, p2355-2379. 25p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Robots, *Police brutality, Neutralization theory, Advice |
| Abstract: |
We investigate whether the perceived ethicalness of police actions changes when police follow an AI-robot's advice. We assess whether perceived ethicalness of police violence is higher when police follow robot advice to arrest a passer-by, compared to no robot advice to arrest the passer-by. Using neutralization theory, we test how blame-shifting occurs. When police violently arrest an innocent passer-by, the violence is neutralized when the decision was made following the AI-robot. Perceived ethicalness of police violence is higher when the passer-by is a terrorist, and police violence against a passer-by is neutralized through 'denial of victim' and 'denial of injury'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Public Management Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Business Source Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
