| Title: |
From individual coping strategies to illness codification: The reflection of gender in social science research on Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS). |
| Authors: |
Nadeau, Geneviève1 gnade090@uottawa.ca, Lippel, Katherine2 klippel@uottawa.ca |
| Source: |
International Journal for Equity in Health. 2014, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p21-43. 21p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*MULTIPLE chemical sensitivity, *DEBATE, *ENVIRONMENTAL health, *EXPERIMENTAL design, *FEMINIST criticism, *GENDER identity, *MENTAL orientation, *GENDER role, *SEXISM, *EVIDENCE-based medicine, *PROFESSIONAL practice, *EMPIRICAL research, *BEHAVIORAL research, *EVALUATION, *DIAGNOSIS |
| Abstract: |
Introduction Emerging fields such as environmental health have been challenged, in recent years, to answer the growing methodological calls for a finer integration of sex and gender in health-related research and policy-making. Methods Through a descriptive examination of 25 peer-reviewed social science papers published between 1996 and 2011, we explore, by examining methodological designs and theoretical standpoints, how the social sciences have integrated gender sensitivity in empirical work on Multiple Chemical Sensitivities (MCS). MCS is a "diagnosis" associated with sensitivities to chronic and low-dose chemical exposures, which remains contested in both the medical and institutional arenas, and is reported to disproportionately affect women. Results We highlighted important differences between papers that did integrate a gender lens and those that did not. These included characteristics of the authorship, purposes, theoretical frameworks and methodological designs of the studies. Reviewed papers that integrated gender tended to focus on the gender roles and identity of women suffering from MCS, emphasizing personal strategies of adaptation. More generally, terminological confusions in the use of sex and gender language and concepts, such as a conflation of women and gender, were observed. Although some men were included in most of the study samples reviewed, specific data relating to men was undereported in results and only one paper discussed issues specifically experienced by men suffering from MCS. Papers that overlooked gender dimensions generally addressed more systemic social issues such as the dynamics of expertise and the medical codification of MCS, from more consistently outlined theoretical frameworks. Results highlight the place for a critical, systematic and reflexive problematization of gender and for the development of methodological and theoretical tools on how to integrate gender in research designs when looking at both micro and macro social dimensions of environmental health conditions. Conclusions This paper contributes to a discussion on the methodological and policy implications of taking sex and gender into account appropriately in order to contribute to better equity in health, especially where the critical social contexts of definition and medico-legal recognition play a major role such as in the case of MCS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of International Journal for Equity in Health is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
