Determination of the free core nutation period from tidal gravity observations of the GGP superconducting gravimeter network.
| Title: | Determination of the free core nutation period from tidal gravity observations of the GGP superconducting gravimeter network. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Bernard Ducarme1, He-Ping Sun2, Jian-Qiao Xu2 |
| Source: | Journal of Geodesy. Mar2007, Vol. 81 Issue 3, p179-187. 9p. |
| Subject Terms: | *EARTH sciences, *TIDES, *NUTATION, *ASTRONOMY |
| Abstract: | Abstract This study is based on 25 long time-series of tidal gravity observations recorded with superconducting gravimeters at 20 stations belonging to the Global Geodynamic Project (GGP). We investigate the diurnal waves around the liquid core resonance, i.e., K 1, ψ1 and φ1, to determine the free core nutation (FCN) period, and compare these experimental results with models of the Earth response to the tidal forces. For this purpose, it is necessary to compute corrected amplitude factors and phase differences by subtracting the ocean tide loading (OTL) effect. To determine this loading effect for each wave, it was thus necessary to interpolate the contribution of the smaller oceanic constituents from the four well determined diurnal waves, i.e., Q 1, O 1, P 1, K 1. It was done for 11 different ocean tide models: SCW80, CSR3.0, CSR4.0, FES95.2, FES99, FES02, TPXO2, ORI96, AG95, NAO99 and GOT00. The numerical results show that no model is decisively better than the others and that a mean tidal loading vector gives the most stable solution for a study of the liquid core resonance. We compared solutions based on the mean of the 11 ocean models to subsets of six models used in a previous study and five more recent ones. The calibration errors put a limit on the accuracy of our global results at the level of 0.1%, although the tidal factors of O 1 and K 1 are determined with an internal precision of close to 0.05%. The results for O 1 more closely fit the DDW99 non-hydrostatic anelastic model than the elastic one. However, the observed tidal factors of K 1 and ψ1 correspond to a shift of the observed resonance with respect to this model. The MAT01 model better fits this resonance shape. From our tidal gravity data set, we computed the FCN eigenperiod. Our best estimation is 429.7 sidereal days (SD), with a 95% confidence interval of (427.3, 432.1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Geodesy is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Academic Search Complete |
Be the first to leave a comment!