تقابل فرم با ایده های زیباشناختی در نقد قوه حکم.
| Title: | تقابل فرم با ایده های زیباشناختی در نقد قوه حکم. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | The Contrast of Form with Aesthetic Ideas in the Critique of Judgment. |
| Authors: | علی سلمانی1 salmani@basu.ac.ir |
| Source: | Philosophy (2008-1553). Mar2025, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p111-131. 21p. |
| Subject Terms: | *AESTHETIC judgment, *SPATIAL arrangement, *IMAGINATION, *JOURNALISTS, *SYNONYMS, *AESTHETICS |
| Abstract: | Form is one of the challenging terms in the Kant's Critique of Judgment. In his Critique of Pure Reason, he discusses in the transcendental aesthetics of form in relation to a priori conditions of intuition, i.e. time and place. In fact, the temporal and spatial arrangement of sensory intuitions is called form. In Critique of Judgment, Kant considers form to be the most important beautifying factor in aesthetic judgment and introduces terms such as design and composition as its synonyms. It is quite clear that the form presented in the third minute is the same form presented in the transcendental aesthetics in the Critique of Pure Reason. On the other hand, in Kant's sudden turn under the discussion of genius and beautiful art, the content of artistic works or aesthetic ideas becomes more important. In this way, a kind of inconsistency can be seen in the issues raised in the Critique of Judgment. Some commentators believe that a kind of change of perspective is observed in Kant's aesthetics due to the failure to justify the universal validity of the aesthetic judgment. On the other hand, some other commentators believe that by presenting a new and comprehensive definition of form in Kant's aesthetics, it is possible to reconcile the two apparently incompatible parts of Kant's Critique of Judgment. After examining the commentaries, it was found that Alison's view is more justified compared to other views. According to Allison, the form is the arrangement of sensible data in such a way as to create a free harmony of imagination and understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Philosophy (2008-1553) is the property of University of Tehran and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Academic Search Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://resolver.ebsco.com/c/xy5jbn/result?sid=EBSCO:a9h&genre=article&issn=20081553&ISBN=&volume=22&issue=2&date=20250301&spage=111&pages=111-131&title=Philosophy (2008-1553)&atitle=%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%84%20%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%85%20%D8%A8%D8%A7%20%D8%A7%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%87%20%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C%20%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%DB%8C%20%D8%AF%D8%B1%20%D9%86%D9%82%D8%AF%20%D9%82%D9%88%D9%87%20%D8%AD%DA%A9%D9%85.&aulast=%D8%B9%D9%84%DB%8C%20%D8%B3%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C&id=DOI:10.22059/jop.2024.365813.1006801 Name: Full Text Finder (for New FTF UI) (s8985755) Category: fullText Text: Find It @ SCU Libraries MouseOverText: Find It @ SCU Libraries |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: a9h DbLabel: Academic Search Complete An: 184594033 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: تقابل فرم با ایده های زیباشناختی در نقد قوه حکم. – Name: TitleAlt Label: Alternate Title Group: TiAlt Data: The Contrast of Form with Aesthetic Ideas in the Critique of Judgment. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22علی+سلمانی%22">علی سلمانی</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> salmani@basu.ac.ir</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Philosophy+%282008-1553%29%22">Philosophy (2008-1553)</searchLink>. Mar2025, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p111-131. 21p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22AESTHETIC+judgment%22">AESTHETIC judgment</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SPATIAL+arrangement%22">SPATIAL arrangement</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22IMAGINATION%22">IMAGINATION</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22JOURNALISTS%22">JOURNALISTS</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22SYNONYMS%22">SYNONYMS</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22AESTHETICS%22">AESTHETICS</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Form is one of the challenging terms in the Kant's Critique of Judgment. In his Critique of Pure Reason, he discusses in the transcendental aesthetics of form in relation to a priori conditions of intuition, i.e. time and place. In fact, the temporal and spatial arrangement of sensory intuitions is called form. In Critique of Judgment, Kant considers form to be the most important beautifying factor in aesthetic judgment and introduces terms such as design and composition as its synonyms. It is quite clear that the form presented in the third minute is the same form presented in the transcendental aesthetics in the Critique of Pure Reason. On the other hand, in Kant's sudden turn under the discussion of genius and beautiful art, the content of artistic works or aesthetic ideas becomes more important. In this way, a kind of inconsistency can be seen in the issues raised in the Critique of Judgment. Some commentators believe that a kind of change of perspective is observed in Kant's aesthetics due to the failure to justify the universal validity of the aesthetic judgment. On the other hand, some other commentators believe that by presenting a new and comprehensive definition of form in Kant's aesthetics, it is possible to reconcile the two apparently incompatible parts of Kant's Critique of Judgment. After examining the commentaries, it was found that Alison's view is more justified compared to other views. According to Allison, the form is the arrangement of sensible data in such a way as to create a free harmony of imagination and understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Philosophy (2008-1553) is the property of University of Tehran and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://login.libproxy.scu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=a9h&AN=184594033 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.22059/jop.2024.365813.1006801 Languages: – Code: per Text: Persian PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 111 Subjects: – SubjectFull: AESTHETIC judgment Type: general – SubjectFull: SPATIAL arrangement Type: general – SubjectFull: IMAGINATION Type: general – SubjectFull: JOURNALISTS Type: general – SubjectFull: SYNONYMS Type: general – SubjectFull: AESTHETICS Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: تقابل فرم با ایده های زیباشناختی در نقد قوه حکم. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: علی سلمانی IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 20081553 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 22 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Philosophy (2008-1553) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |