Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
تقابل فرم با ایده های زیباشناختی در نقد قوه حکم. |
| Alternate Title: |
The Contrast of Form with Aesthetic Ideas in the Critique of Judgment. |
| Authors: |
علی سلمانی1 salmani@basu.ac.ir |
| Source: |
Philosophy (2008-1553). Mar2025, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p111-131. 21p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*AESTHETIC judgment, *SPATIAL arrangement, *IMAGINATION, *JOURNALISTS, *SYNONYMS, *AESTHETICS |
| Abstract: |
Form is one of the challenging terms in the Kant's Critique of Judgment. In his Critique of Pure Reason, he discusses in the transcendental aesthetics of form in relation to a priori conditions of intuition, i.e. time and place. In fact, the temporal and spatial arrangement of sensory intuitions is called form. In Critique of Judgment, Kant considers form to be the most important beautifying factor in aesthetic judgment and introduces terms such as design and composition as its synonyms. It is quite clear that the form presented in the third minute is the same form presented in the transcendental aesthetics in the Critique of Pure Reason. On the other hand, in Kant's sudden turn under the discussion of genius and beautiful art, the content of artistic works or aesthetic ideas becomes more important. In this way, a kind of inconsistency can be seen in the issues raised in the Critique of Judgment. Some commentators believe that a kind of change of perspective is observed in Kant's aesthetics due to the failure to justify the universal validity of the aesthetic judgment. On the other hand, some other commentators believe that by presenting a new and comprehensive definition of form in Kant's aesthetics, it is possible to reconcile the two apparently incompatible parts of Kant's Critique of Judgment. After examining the commentaries, it was found that Alison's view is more justified compared to other views. According to Allison, the form is the arrangement of sensible data in such a way as to create a free harmony of imagination and understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Philosophy (2008-1553) is the property of University of Tehran and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
