Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
‘An Unimaginable Challenge’: A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study of Ethics and Decision-Making Around Tracheostomy Ventilation in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. |
| Authors: |
Ozeki-Hayashi, Reina1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Wilkinson, Dominic J. C.4,5,6,7 (AUTHOR) dominic.wilkinson@uehiro.ox.ac.uk |
| Source: |
AJOB Empirical Bioethics. Mar2025, p1-13. 13p. 5 Charts. |
| Abstract: |
AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionsThe rate of tracheostomy with invasive ventilation (TIV) for patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) varies widely. Previous studies have shown that doctors’ values may affect decision-making. There have been no previous international qualitative comparisons of medical decision-making process for TIV or why practice varies.We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 16 doctors actively involved in the management of ALS patients from Japan (n = 7), the UK (n = 5), and the US (n = 4). We used three hypothetical cases to explore decision-making. Conversations were transcribed and thematically analyzed.Our data reveals similarities but also marked differences in views between the US, the UK and Japan. Almost all participants stated that they ought to respect patient autonomy. However, their approaches varied. British participants wanted to (and felt that they should) respect patient autonomy, but they also believed that TIV was not a realistic option. US participants were likely to prioritize patient autonomy over other ethical principles, and Japanese participants were likely to limit patient autonomy indirectly. The option of TIV appeared to be heavily influenced by the availability of healthcare resources in all three countries. The high cost, limited availability and difficulty of treatment meant that particularly in the UK and the US, it is challenging to receive TIV even if patients wanted this.Our study illustrates how the emphasis on autonomy varies along with variations in the way care is organized in the setting of highly resource intensive treatment and progressive severe disabling illness. There is a need to review elements of the decision-making process in all three countries. This includes the need for transparent, ideally centralized, decision-making guidelines about the provision of TIV. Although we investigated a rare neuromuscular disease, our results will be relevant to other diseases requiring highly resource-intensive treatment toward the end of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of AJOB Empirical Bioethics is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
Full Text from Taylor & Francis