The impact of different cervical planning target volume designs on efficacy and toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

Bibliographic Details
Title: The impact of different cervical planning target volume designs on efficacy and toxicity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.
Authors: Wang, Lin1 (AUTHOR), Wang, Hui-Min1 (AUTHOR), Tang, Fan1 (AUTHOR), Zhang, Yan-Ting1 (AUTHOR), Shi, Rong-Rong1 (AUTHOR), Wang, Sheng-Hui1 (AUTHOR), Liang, Si-Chao1 (AUTHOR), Gao, Liao-Ming2 (AUTHOR), Chen, Zhi-Ting3 (AUTHOR), Li, Bao-Feng4 (AUTHOR) BaofengLix@163.com, Chen, Bei1 (AUTHOR) cb18789235270@163.com
Source: BMC Cancer. 3/17/2025, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p.
Subject Terms: *NASOPHARYNX cancer, *SURVIVAL rate, *RADIATION doses, *LYMPH nodes, *CONFIDENCE intervals
Abstract: Background: In nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, two radiation target delineation patterns are used for the cervical lymph node area. Purpose: This study compares the efficacy and toxicity of two radiation target volume delineation patterns for planning target volumes (PTVs) in NPC patients. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 387 non-metastatic NPC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2017 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: the 2-PTV group with two dose gradients (50–54 Gy and 66–70 Gy) and the 3-PTV group with an additional 60–63 Gy dose. Results: After a median follow-up of 51.2 months, the 3-year regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) showed no significant differences between the 3-PTV and 2-PTV groups (96.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 96.5%–96.8%] and 96.3% [95% CI: 96.2%–96.3%]). In the N3 subgroup, the 3-year RRFS was also comparable between the 3-PTV and 2-PTV groups (96.2% [95% CI: 76%–99%] vs. 95% [95% CI: 69%–99%], p = 0.727). Importantly, the 2-PTV group demonstrated significantly lower rates of grade 3/4 dermatitis (5.1% vs. 16.5%; HR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82–0.94, p = 0.002) and xerostomia (49.6% vs. 67%; HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72–0.84, p = 0.002). Conclusions: The 2-PTV regimen achieved equivalent survival outcomes while significantly reducing treatment-related toxicities compared to the 3-PTV approach. These results suggest that the 2-PTV strategy may offer a more favorable therapeutic profile for NPC patients, particularly in minimizing severe dermatitis and xerostomia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BMC Cancer is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:14712407
DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13865-y
Published in:BMC Cancer
Language:English