Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry—A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Prediction of Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review. |
| Authors: |
Icătoiu, Elena1,2 (AUTHOR), Vlădulescu-Trandafir, Andreea-Iulia2,3 (AUTHOR) andreea-iulia.trandafir@drd.umfcd.ro, Groșeanu, Laura-Maria1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Berghea, Florian1,2 (AUTHOR), Cobilinschi, Claudia-Oana1,2 (AUTHOR), Potcovaru, Claudia-Gabriela2,3 (AUTHOR), Bălănescu, Andra-Rodica1,2 (AUTHOR), Bojincă, Violeta-Claudia1,2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Diagnostics (2075-4418). Mar2025, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p555. 31p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*DUAL-energy X-ray absorptiometry, *BONE densitometry, *BONE health, *BONE density, *VERTEBRAL fractures |
| Abstract: |
Background/Objectives: Given the significant economic and social burden of osteoporosis, there is growing interest in developing an efficient alternative to the traditional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) is an innovative, non-ionizing imaging technique that recently emerged as a viable tool to diagnose osteoporosis and estimate the fragility fracture risk. Nevertheless, its clinical use is still limited due to its novelty and continuing uncertainty of long-term performance. Methods: In order to evaluate the accuracy of the REMS, a systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted. Three databases were searched for relevant publications from 1 January 2015 until 1 December 2024 using the keyword combinations "(radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry OR REMS) AND (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry OR DXA)". The initial search yielded 602 candidate articles. After screening the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria, 17 publications remained for full-text evaluation. Results: The reviewed studies demonstrated strong diagnostic agreement between REMS and DXA. Additionally, REMS showed enhanced diagnostic capabilities in cases where lumbar bone mineral density measurements by DXA were impaired by artifacts such as vertebral fractures, deformities, osteoarthritis, or vascular calcifications. REMS exhibited excellent intra-operator repeatability and precision, comparable to or exceeding the reported performance of DXA. The fragility score (FS), a parameter reflecting bone quality and structural integrity, effectively discriminated between fractured and non-fractured patients. Moreover, REMS proved to be a radiation-free option for bone health monitoring in radiation-sensitive populations or patients requiring frequent imaging to assess fracture risk. Conclusions: This current study underscores the robustness of REMS as a reliable method for diagnosing and monitoring osteoporosis and evaluating bone fragility via the FS. It also identifies critical knowledge gaps and emphasizes the need for further prospective studies to validate and expand the clinical applications of REMS across diverse patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Diagnostics (2075-4418) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
