Internal consistency and structural validity of the Swiss easy-read Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with dementia: a secondary exploratory factor analysis.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Internal consistency and structural validity of the Swiss easy-read Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with dementia: a secondary exploratory factor analysis.
Authors: Spichiger, Frank1 frank.spichiger@hefr.ch, Meichtry, André2, Larkin, Philip3,4, Koppitz, Andrea1
Source: BMC Palliative Care. 2/22/2025, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
Subject Terms: *TREATMENT of dementia, *PALLIATIVE treatment, *SECONDARY analysis, *RESEARCH funding, *RESEARCH methodology evaluation, *FAMILIES, *SYMPTOM burden, *NURSING care facilities, *PSYCHOMETRICS, *FRONTLINE personnel, *RESEARCH methodology, *RESEARCH, *HEALTH outcome assessment, *FACTOR analysis, *DEMENTIA patients, *EVALUATION, RESEARCH evaluation
Geographic Terms: SWITZERLAND
Abstract: Background: The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale for People with Dementia (IPOS-Dem) was developed as a promising person-centred proxy measure of symptoms and concerns. We used the Swiss-German easy-read version, a measure designed to be completed individually by family members and frontline staff caring for people with dementia. In this secondary data analysis of multicentre trial data, we investigate the IPOS-Dem's structural validity and internal consistency of the version. Methods: A total of 257 people with dementia were assessed by frontline staff, while family members assessed 118 people residing in one of 23 participating Swiss-German long-term care facilities. Each IPOS-Dem version, corresponding to the two rater populations (family members and frontline staff), underwent exploratory factor analysis separately, using data from one assessment per person with dementia. A minimum residual solution with varimax rotation was calculated to determine the factor structure. Item reduction decisions were based on factor loadings and indices for internal consistency. Results: The construct validity of the Swiss-German easy-read IPOS-Dem for frontline staff is demonstrated by two factors: Dementia Interaction and Physical Impact (Cronbach's α = 0.83) and Dementia Emotional and Behavioural Impact (Cronbach's α = 0.81). Four factors, with Cronbach's α ranging from 0.77 to 0.86, were computed for the family member version: Dementia Interaction Impact, Easy-to-Assess Dementia Physical Impact, Hard-to-Assess Dementia Physical Impact and Dementia Emotional and Behavioural Impact. Conclusions: Like other reduced patient-related outcome measures, palliative care measures and their parent instrument IPOS we identified subscales in the easy-read IPOS-Dem that describe a psychosocial impact and a physical impact. Differences in the internal structure of the family and staff versions of the IPOS-Dem likely stem from variations in observation intervals, roles and perspectives, with family members often focusing on loss and past experiences whereas staff may equate quality of life with quality of care leading to differing ratings. However, the identified internal consistency indices between 0.77 and 0.86 indicate acceptable internal consistency for the subscales and the IPOS-Dem should be taken forward for further psychometric evaluation. Trial registration: The overarching trial has been approved by the Swiss Regional Ethics Committee of the Canton of Zürich as the leading ethics committee for the involved regions, with clearance certification number BASEC2019-01847 (12/11/2019). The main study and secondary analysis are registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022339, 05/10/2020). Full registration is available online at http://www.drks.de/DRKS00022339. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of BMC Palliative Care is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
More Details
ISSN:1472684X
DOI:10.1186/s12904-025-01691-9
Published in:BMC Palliative Care
Language:English