Racial identity as a moderator of same-race bias among Hispanic mock-jurors.

Bibliographic Details
Title: Racial identity as a moderator of same-race bias among Hispanic mock-jurors.
Authors: Swaby, Monique1 (AUTHOR), Virgen, Teresa2 (AUTHOR), Dianat, Aundia3 (AUTHOR), Edwards, Jayla2 (AUTHOR), Olmos, Karina2 (AUTHOR), Eisen, Mitchell L.2 (AUTHOR) meisen@calstatela.edu
Source: Psychology, Crime & Law. Feb2025, p1-22. 22p.
Subject Terms: *RACE identity, *ASSAULT & battery, *CRIMINAL procedure, *RACE, *INDIVIDUAL differences
Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to examine whether individual differences in racial identity attitudes moderated same-race bias among Hispanic mock-jurors. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 263) completed the People of Color Racial Identity Attitude Scale (PRIAS) and read a summary of a fictitious criminal case in which either a Hispanic or non-Hispanic White defendant was accused of assaulting a non-Hispanic White victim. As predicted, Hispanic mock-jurors who more closely identified with their own group were significantly less likely to find the same-race defendant guilty compared to those who scored lower on this scale. Experiment 2 (N = 537) used a different summary of a criminal assault case and also varied the victim’s race (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic White). Results replicated Experiment 1, as Hispanic mock-jurors who scored higher in Immersion/Resistance racial identity attitudes were significantly less likely to find the same-race defendant guilty when the victim was not Hispanic. However, when the victim was also Hispanic, racial identity attitudes no longer predicted mock-juror decision-making in either the same- or other-race conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Psychology, Crime & Law is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Academic Search Complete
More Details
ISSN:1068316X
DOI:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2466077
Published in:Psychology, Crime & Law
Language:English