| Title: |
Evaluating the Retreatability of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Using Root Canal Instrumentation—An In Vitro Study. |
| Authors: |
Malik, Akanksha1 (AUTHOR), Kothari, Anjali1 (AUTHOR), Mehta, Charmi1 (AUTHOR), Rao, Vinay1 (AUTHOR), Sule, Kavita1 (AUTHOR), Agrawal, Deep1 (AUTHOR) agrawaldeep9999@gmail.com, Patel, Priyal1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 2024 Suppl, Vol. 16, pS3544-S3546. 3p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*PIT & fissure sealants (Dentistry), *ROOT canal treatment, *GUTTA-percha, *BICUSPIDS, *DISSECTING microscopes |
| Abstract: |
ABSTRACT: Aim: This study aimed to compare the retreatability of hydraulic calcium silicate-based (HCSB) and epoxy resin-based sealers in single-rooted mandibular premolars, with a specific focus on sealer remnants and retreatment duration. Methodology: Sixty mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared and obturated with BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, or AH Plus. After a one-month period, the gutta-percha was removed and the specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Result: BioRoot RCS showed the most remnants and longest retreatment time, while AH Plus was the most efficient. Conclusion: BioRoot RCS is less favorable for retreatment, with AH Plus being the most effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Academic Search Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests. |
Login for full access.
|
